Ajay Ahuja Has Threatened To Take Legal Action Against Me

Oh shit, here we go again. I have another potential legal battle on my grubby little hands.

Brief Bio on Ajay Ahuja

Ajay Ahuja is known in the BTL industry by many people for his £10m property empire, which he started with just £500. He’s also known for his property sourcing company, The Ahuja Group, which sources Below Market Value (BMV) properties to investors for a fee. You can see more details about his company on his website.

My relationship with Ajay Ahuja

Ajay initially approached me in September 2009 about promoting his company on my website. After discussions, we came to an agreement, which lead to him advertising on my website for a few months. Unfortunately, he wasn’t generating as many leads as he wanted, and the leads he did receive weren’t converting, so we gracefully opted out of the relationship.

Everything was cool and we were on good terms.

When it started to go wrong for Ajay Ahuja

On the 2nd of November 2009, “Inside Out, London” On BBC1, did a report on Ajay Ahuja. Basically, people were claiming that they were being ripped off by him/his company. They were allegedly sourcing properties that weren’t actually Below Market Value as advertised. And to add insult to injury, the disgruntled clients were finding it difficult to get in contact with Ajay Ahuja to get refunds.

I found this case particularly interesting because I had personally dealt with Ajay Ahuja.

I’d just like to clarify that I NEVER endorsed or bad mouthed his company at any point, I have merely discussed what has been reported about him. However, I did want Ajay’s side of the story, because as we all know, the media can be biased. I got in contact with Ajay and asked if I could do an interview with him based on the BBC report. He was more than happy to answer my questions. I’m sure he was eager to push his side of the story out there.

At this point, everything between me and Ajay Ahuja was cool, so I got my interview with Ajay Ahuja.

When it started to get even worse for Ajay Ahuja

On the 29th April 2010 Sky news sent in 2 undercover journalists to investigate Ajay Ahuja’s practices, because like the BBC, they had also heard from a significant amount of unsatisfied customers.

Naturally, I followed up the story, and I proceeded to discuss the case, Ajay Ahuja Gets Investigated By Undercover Sky News Journalists.

I strictly ensured I didn’t pass judgement on whether Ajay’s company was guilty or innocent of what he was being accused of, I simply discussed the facts about what was being said in the report.

The legal threat from Ajay Ahuja

On the 1st May 2010 I receive an email from Ajay Ahuja, which I’ll briefly summarise below:

  • Ajay asked me to remove any negative articles about him and his organisation from my site, including any videos and articles about him.
  • He informed me that he now has a solicitor to defend his business
  • He stated he does not want to get into a legal battle with me because he has been winning legal battles E.g. he told me he has successfully eliminated 12 out of 14 cases bought to him by Landlord Action, and 2 of those cases are pending.

My response:

Hey Ajay,

Legally, I’m not obligated to remove any content from my site unless it is breaking some form of law e.g. libellous, infringing copyright laws. I’ve been through this procedure 3 times now with various other companies.

If any of my articles are displaying illegal content, please specify exactly what is illegal and how. If that is the case, I will immediately remove the content and apologise for any inconvenience. I don’t want to host or be involved with any illegal practises. However, all the articles I have written about you haven’t been libellous because all I’ve done is state the facts based on the news reports, I haven’t expressed what is true or false.

Moreover, you have endorsed and commented on all my blog posts about you (apart from the latest Sky report). I even have emails of you discussing the content, with no sign of hesitation or concern. So requesting the removal of content months after it was published, which you were aware of, doesn’t seem fair.

Like you, I don’t want to get involved in a legal battle. So as said, if I’m breaking the law and you actually have grounds on taking legal action against me, please specify where and how, and I will happily and eagerly remove the content.

I hope we can come to some mutual agreement.

Kind regards,

His response summarised:

  • He asked me to remove the BBC video because it is a Copyright infringement
  • He asked me to remove the SKY video because it is a Copyright infringement
  • He asked me to remove all offensive postings and threatening comments towards himself and his staff.
  • He stated that he will be taking BBC and Sky to court on various matters regarding what is the truth.
  • Ajay ensures me he WILL be going after Sky.
  • Ajay will go after smaller sites and publishers who have displayed false information on his company, if he thinks it’s worth it.
  • Finally, if I comply with his 3 requests (removing the 2 videos and remove threatening comments) he advised me he would feel happy for now.

My Response:

Hey Ajay,

Unfortunately, you don’t own the copyright to those videos, so Sky and the BBC will have to file those cases with me personally, and I think you’re aware of that. Moreover, I’m not hosting those videos on my servers, so the BBC and SKY won’t even have a case against me.

If you tell me which comments in particular e.g. Page URL and comment number, I will have them removed, as long as they are actually of a threatening/abusive nature. So ultimately, I’m willing to do exactly what you want, besides from the 2 issues which you have no real rights over.

Like I said, I’ve not endorsed or bad mouthed your business, I’ve simply discussed what the reports said. And if you prove to win your cases, I will also report that!

I believe I’m being more than fair about this, and I’m following the rules by the law. Whenever you had issues about any of the comments on my site (e.g. when someone revealed your address), I immediately took action as a gesture of good will.

Kind regards

His Response summarised:

  • He requested for my address so he can send me legal documents.

Ouch!!!! I guess business really is business with Ajay!! That’s a real shame.

My thoughts

  • I’m still uncertain on which grounds Ajay is going to take legal action against me on. Does anyone have any ideas? Is his claim going to be, “you discussed a report which was on national TV, you can’t do that“?
  • Ajay mentioned that he will go after smaller websites/publishers who have displayed false information on his company. The thing is, I’ve not said anything untrue. I’ve basically commented on what the BBC and SKY reports have said.
  • I find it odd that Ajay suddenly has a problem with ALL the articles that have negatively mentioned his name and his company when he didn’t have a problem before. He was cool with the BBC report I discussed. The SKY report I covered was no different in nature. So why all of a sudden is he saying he is going to take legal action against me? *sigh*
  • I understand and can even sympathize that Ajay must be pissed off that his company is getting such bad press, but surely it’s not a crime for someone to discuss what the media are already putting out there, or is it?
  • I thought it was a bit weird that he told me to remove videos that he doesn’t even own the copyright to. However, as a gesture of goodwill, I have removed the embedded sky video from my website, and replaced it with a link to the video hosted by Sky News :)
  • He never told me which abusive/threatening comments in specific he wanted me to remove, even though it was one of his requests. I asked him specifically which comments he had a problem with.
  • I was/am willing to comply with every one of his requests as long as they are 1) reasonable 2) with in his grounds. Telling me to remove links to videos which he doesn’t own the copyright to is NOT with in his grounds. Anyways, like I said, I’ve removed the embedded video anyways.
  • This whole issue is rather ironic. There’s a host of people filing cases against Ajay Ahuja for allegedly ripping them off, and in the meantime he’s allegedly in the process of filing a case against me… for no real reason, from what I can tell.
  • I’ve never said a bad word about Ajay Ahuja or his company, not even to this day. I’ve merely discussed what has been said in other reports. I still maintain that I don’t know enough to judge his business practices. However, I’m confident he has both satisfied and unsatisfied customers. Having said that, on a personal level, I think he’s demonstrating that he’s capable of being an extremely unreasonable and irrational individual.

Can anyone powerful/influential from SKY News or The BBC hear me?

Apparently Ajay is going after you guys, so we have common ground. On that note, can either of you guys lend me your lawyer(s)? Your generosity wouldn’t go unnoticed, I promise! Ta’

11 Join the Conversation...

Guest Avatar
Aunty_P 4th May, 2010 @ 11:07

I remember reading your first report and thinking how fair and balanced it was. Hope this is just bluster, sure you can do without the hassle and stress of it all. Good luck!

Guest Avatar
Twattybollocks 4th May, 2010 @ 12:09

Blimey - Ahuja has got his pantyhose in a twist hasn't he!

The BBC/SKY report is, in its very nature by way of broadcast, in the public domain. The last time I looked the UK still dos not have draconian censorship and the whole basis of the constitution of the country is free speech. The caveat is libel or slander. One further complication could be subjudicy where current/potential future cases are being discussed but as I am only a barrack room lawyer I would have to defer to those who charge by the quarter hour.

As he has not objected to being called rotten in previous posts (a certain Mr Standing comes to mind) I do not see how he can object now. Let him spend money on his so called lawyers. After all - the worst that can happen is you have to remove the offending articles and that will cast further doubt on his professionalism and business ethics.

Surely you could add a comment stating that all comments are those of the original authors and not those of the propertyinvestment project or it's agents? Seems to work with the newspapers letters pages.


Guest Avatar
mike 4th May, 2010 @ 16:22

I would not worry about it at all.
It just seems like a bullying tactic to me.
He was happy enough to talk to you on his own grounds, so he must be okay using a public forum to air his business.
Didnt he say that all publicity is good publicity?

The Landlord Avatar
The Landlord 4th May, 2010 @ 19:21

Hey guys,

Thanks for the support, much appreciated!

Twattybollocks: There's a disclaimer and T&C link on all pages in the footer, which says exactly that!

I'm still not sure what I've done wrong, so I guess it's just a waiting game right now.

Thanks once again all.

Guest Avatar
iffy 5th May, 2010 @ 22:49


wow..i have to say,he's got balls to go and fight with SKY. what is he thinking? if he's got brains lol. its not a small business...its one of the biggest businesses in uk.

if he has done the wrong things then he deserves going down and i wish they do close him down...for the problems he's caused these people.

i wonder why people have just left him alone.

anyways nice website.great job. any books or magzines?



Guest Avatar
NS 1 6th May, 2010 @ 18:16

oh FFS what a twat.


Guest Avatar
GillsMan 12th May, 2010 @ 15:01

I also remember reading the original articles, particularly the interview with Ahuja and thinking that it was about as balanced as this chap is likely to get.

Completely back your stance on this, he is, unfortunately, picking on one of the few people he hasn't made an enemy of yet.

Guest Avatar
Mark Barrow 13th May, 2010 @ 13:57

Really wouldn't pay any attention to his hollow threats (and my advice would be to cut communication with him unless through a legal third party) - he's just a bully boy. He wouldn't stand a cat-in-hell's chance of taking on the Beeb or Sky - apart from anything else, the procedure is to make a complaint to the TV ombudsman, who will assess if the reporting was balanced or biased, not a court - the fact he doesn't know this shows it's all wind and hot air. At the end of the day he created the negative reporting by his sharp practices, which is why more and more cases are being brought against him. He/his organization is only interested in one thing, and that's to get as much money in through the door by whatever means possible. Any legitimate company would have bent over backwards to fix any problems the moment they arose to protect their good name, the fact he actively avoids contact with disgruntled customers speaks volumes, so he has only himself to blame for the negative press across the web. Getting a response from his 'team' (which seems to be made up of just him and his wife - the people he uses to phone out to leads are a virtual PA company), especially if they owe you money! Just one thing to say to Ajay - KARMA!

Guest Avatar
Mark Barrow 13th May, 2010 @ 14:07

PS - if he has CCJ's against his name he won't be able to get a mortgage, so no more property buying for him, which explains his shift in tact to 'sourcing', now that is being effected he's starting to panic, which is why he's trying to intimidate you now. If he really did have a legal case why isn't his solicitor contacting you, rather than him?

Guest Avatar
SPOJ 25th June, 2010 @ 00:23

Has there been any further developments in this saga? I'm keen to know....

Great website BTW.

The Landlord Avatar
The Landlord 25th June, 2010 @ 06:35


Thanks a lot!

There's been no development. I haven't heard anything since!

Kind regards :)

















Your personal information will *never* be sold or shared to a 3rd party. By submitting your details, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

I want more info on...