
Man, how times have changed.
The first iteration of this blog post was an absolute waffle-fest (all good stuff, mind you), going over various different scenarios and possible outcomes.
But since the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1st May 2026 – rightly or wrongly – everything around evictions and terminating tenancies in England has become a lot more, well, simple (at least from a practical point of view). So, to be honest, almost 90% of this blog post has been tossed in the trash, because there are only a couple of key things you need to understand when it comes to tenants wanting to leave early.
Just to clarify, I know a lot has been said about the current state of the private rental sector following the Renters’ Rights Act – overwhelmingly negative – and there is definitely a time and place to have that brawl. However, for the purposes of simply sharing the essential information on the issue at hand, I am not going to get into the politics of whether it is fair or unfair. I’m just to focus on how it is.
Can My Tenant Leave Early?
The question itself is, in most cases, no longer relevant.
Fixed-term Assured Shorthold Tenancies ended on 1 May and became Assured Periodic Tenancies (APT), meaning agreements now continue on a rolling monthly or weekly basis, depending on how rent is paid.
So, technically, tenants can serve notice from the very start of the tenancy, provided they give the required notice period. Tenants can remain in the property until they choose to leave by giving up to two months’ notice (although tenancy agreements may allow for a shorter notice period, but they cannot be required to provide more than two months).
My Tenant Wants To Leave Before The Notice Period
Okay, so this can potentially be an issue.
While the tenant is obligated to provide the required notice period, in this case they are requesting to leave sooner than agreed. So, for example, the tenant is obligated to give two months’ notice, but is pleading for one month to be accepted instead.
From a legal standpoint, the tenant is obligated to see out the tenancy until the notice period expires. Until then, they remain bound by the terms of the tenancy and must continue to fulfil their obligations (for example, paying rent on time). The landlord is under no obligation to accept an early termination.
In this situation, the landlord has three options:
- Enforce Contractual Notice Period: Require the tenant to fulfil their contractual obligations until the end of the notice period.
- Negotiate a Compromise: Negotiate and meet halfway, or agree to end the tenancy once a new tenant is found, provided this does not exceed the tenant’s contractual notice period.
- Mutual Early Surrender: Mutually agree to allow the tenant to surrender the tenancy early.
There is no strict right or wrong approach, to be honest. However, for what it’s worth, I would generally lean towards agreeing an early termination, for the following reasons:
- Minimal Practical Impact: In the worst case, the tenant is only leaving a couple of months early, so it’s rarely a major issue in practical terms.
- Changing Circumstances: Circumstances change, and I can be empathetic to that.
- Legal Action vs Practicality: If a tenant leaves without agreement, your only real option is legal action to recover losses such as unpaid rent or re-letting costs. However, the time, cost, and effort involved often outweigh the benefit compared to simply reaching an agreement.
- Goodwill Consideration: If the tenant has been long-standing and reliable, it may also be worth accommodating them as a gesture of goodwill.
Like I said, there is really not much to it anymore, since the process of ending tenancies has been significantly simplified. Easy-peasy!
I guess, potentially, the biggest decision a landlord may have to make in this situation is whether they allow their tenant to leave earlier than the notice period. For everyone else, there is not really much to consider, as it is simply a case of accepting the notice and planning for what’s next!
Landlord out xo
Disclaimer: I'm just a landlord blogger; I'm 100% not qualified to give legal or financial advice. I'm a doofus. Any information I share is my unqualified opinion, and should never be construed as professional legal or financial advice. You should definitely get advice from a qualified professional for any legal or financial matters. For more information, please read my full disclaimer.
Landlord Products / Services







I can assure you that my personal situation has been known about by all my tenants for a long time. (age/health etc) . They have all been on borrowed time in reality as I could easily have evicted years ago due to my health and financial situation and most had a damn sight better lifestyle than I did as I struggled with the recession. Most are grateful that I did not just bail out and allowed them to run arrears etc in the bad times.
I agree that you can sell a property tenanted but you will find that it is treated as an investment value and not the achievable value. There are schemes whereby you can sell your property to ''investment people'' but their usual strategy is to buy cheaper, allow the tenant to live there for six months before evicting or then raise rents or sell at a profit. A few of my tenants have expressed a fear that if I do sell tenanted that they might end up on the street anyway or be landed with a landlord who does not treat them so well or evicts if one months rent is late. They would prefer to be given good notice, and that is usually a minimum of a year so they can look around.
Some will use it as an 'excuse' if that is the word to move out of town so that they can be nearer relatives.
I have one tenant who thought that I would sell and was happy that this was not the case because it allowed their kids to leave school and at this point they would probably have to move anyway due to DHSS rules. So I do talk to tenants a lot and I am not the evict with no reason type.
Sadly a tenanted property usually shows a great deal of ageing. Often this is cosmetic like advocado bathroom suite or older colours in the kitchen units. With the last house I sold I was offered two thirds of the achieved price merely because it needed updating with a new kitchen and bathroom although it was in very very clean condition. Funny thing is that although I replaced kitchen and bathroom the buyers ripped it all out !!! One house we sold years ago only had low offers because my daughter lived there with students but was in totally renovated condition. It was upsetting to say the least when the new owners sold a year later for 50% profit.
There is also the financial aspect regarding mortgages and achievable rents. I am not up to date on current lending but lenders used to expect a rent of 125% of the mortgage. On current DHSS rates that is not achievable.
So no I am not cruel or heartless and do talk extensively to tenants but as any gains from my properties are my pension then that has to be considered. I could sell within my family but after 4 years in the business my daughter will be selling her stock as she is changing direction and moved away and can't handle distance tenancies.
Finally but not the subject you think about or want to is inheritance tax. That's why an exit plan is important.