
Man, how times have changed.
The first iteration of this blog post was an absolute waffle-fest (all good stuff, mind you), going over various different scenarios and possible outcomes.
But since the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1st May 2026 – rightly or wrongly – everything around evictions and terminating tenancies in England has become a lot more, well, simple (at least from a practical point of view). So, to be honest, almost 90% of this blog post has been tossed in the trash, because there are only a couple of key things you need to understand when it comes to tenants wanting to leave early.
Just to clarify, I know a lot has been said about the current state of the private rental sector following the Renters’ Rights Act – overwhelmingly negative – and there is definitely a time and place to have that brawl. However, for the purposes of simply sharing the essential information on the issue at hand, I am not going to get into the politics of whether it is fair or unfair. I’m just to focus on how it is.
Can My Tenant Leave Early?
The question itself is, in most cases, no longer relevant.
Fixed-term Assured Shorthold Tenancies ended on 1 May and became Assured Periodic Tenancies (APT), meaning agreements now continue on a rolling monthly or weekly basis, depending on how rent is paid.
So, technically, tenants can serve notice from the very start of the tenancy, provided they give the required notice period. Tenants can remain in the property until they choose to leave by giving up to two months’ notice (although tenancy agreements may allow for a shorter notice period, but they cannot be required to provide more than two months).
My Tenant Wants To Leave Before The Notice Period
Okay, so this can potentially be an issue.
While the tenant is obligated to provide the required notice period, in this case they are requesting to leave sooner than agreed. So, for example, the tenant is obligated to give two months’ notice, but is pleading for one month to be accepted instead.
From a legal standpoint, the tenant is obligated to see out the tenancy until the notice period expires. Until then, they remain bound by the terms of the tenancy and must continue to fulfil their obligations (for example, paying rent on time). The landlord is under no obligation to accept an early termination.
In this situation, the landlord has three options:
- Enforce Contractual Notice Period: Require the tenant to fulfil their contractual obligations until the end of the notice period.
- Negotiate a Compromise: Negotiate and meet halfway, or agree to end the tenancy once a new tenant is found, provided this does not exceed the tenant’s contractual notice period.
- Mutual Early Surrender: Mutually agree to allow the tenant to surrender the tenancy early.
There is no strict right or wrong approach, to be honest. However, for what it’s worth, I would generally lean towards agreeing an early termination, for the following reasons:
- Minimal Practical Impact: In the worst case, the tenant is only leaving a couple of months early, so it’s rarely a major issue in practical terms.
- Changing Circumstances: Circumstances change, and I can be empathetic to that.
- Legal Action vs Practicality: If a tenant leaves without agreement, your only real option is legal action to recover losses such as unpaid rent or re-letting costs. However, the time, cost, and effort involved often outweigh the benefit compared to simply reaching an agreement.
- Goodwill Consideration: If the tenant has been long-standing and reliable, it may also be worth accommodating them as a gesture of goodwill.
Like I said, there is really not much to it anymore, since the process of ending tenancies has been significantly simplified. Easy-peasy!
I guess, potentially, the biggest decision a landlord may have to make in this situation is whether they allow their tenant to leave earlier than the notice period. For everyone else, there is not really much to consider, as it is simply a case of accepting the notice and planning for what’s next!
Landlord out xo
Disclaimer: I'm just a landlord blogger; I'm 100% not qualified to give legal or financial advice. I'm a doofus. Any information I share is my unqualified opinion, and should never be construed as professional legal or financial advice. You should definitely get advice from a qualified professional for any legal or financial matters. For more information, please read my full disclaimer.
Landlord Products / Services







@ Nige
Well I'll possibly be in your position in the next 10 or so years (65 and not so keen anymore to climb ladders, still property gave me my Fnck You money for the last 10 years, I now work for fun). Question: is there such a thing as usefruct in British law? In South Africa you can leave your property/s to your children a bit at a time tax free with the understanding that as it belongs to them they are responsible for the maintenance (and can claim the tax deduction) while you as the possessor of the usefruct have the "enjoyment" of the property/s until death. Besides the profits on the rents has to be better than the cash invested in the bank scenario and HMRC will hit you with CGT if you sell.