Tenancy Agreement Break Clauses

I personally don’t have break clauses in my Tenancy Agreements, and I’ll tell you why, just after I’ve covered the basics…

What are break clauses in Tenancy Agreements?

A Break clause is a clause in tenancy agreements provide an opportunity for the tenant and/or the landlord to give notice (typically 2 months notice) during the fixed-term of the tenancy to end the tenancy early. Essentially, either party can “break” the tenancy before the end date, as long as the correct procedures are followed.

However, it’s important to note, even if the tenancy does include a break clause, the Housing Act 1988 prevents the court from awarding possession to a landlord until six months into the tenancy has passed from the beginning of the agreement, unless the landlord is using one of the seventeen statutory grounds for possession, in which case the landlord has rights to evict the tenant and should serve a Section 8 Notice. So, break clauses typically stipulate that they can only be enforced 6 months into the fixed term of a tenancy.

Here is an example of a break clause (please do NOT use it, this may not be valid):

20 Mutual breaking clause
Any time after six months of the initial fixed term of this tenancy either party may invoke this break clause by providing a minimum of 60 days written notice to the other (such notice to expire on the last day of a rental period of the tenancy). At the end of such notice the tenancy shall end and all obligations and responsibilities shall cease; subject nevertheless to any claim by either party against the other in respect of any breach of any of the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Giving notice

The landlord is required to provide at least two months notice to the tenant if they wish to enforce the break clause by serving a Section 21 Notice. So for example, if the tenancy starts on 1st of January, the landlord should serve notice on April 1st, which means the tenant should vacate on June 1st (6 months from when the tenancy began).

If the tenant wants to enforce the break clause, they must also give 2 months notice to the landlord by serving a written notice (not a Section 21) after 6 months into the tenancy. The tenant should serve a written document with signature, surrendering the tenancy.

Please note, the correct party should receive the notice before or on the day of those dates.

Why the break clause is used

Break clauses really are about flexibility for both tenant and landlord. They provide landlords/tenants the opportunity to break a tenancy if personal circumstances change. This could include scenarios such as relocating for work related purposes, or even because the relationship between the tenant and landlord turned sour.

The reason I don’t use break clauses

As mentioned, I don’t use break clauses in my tenancy agreements, the reason being is that they don’t seem convincingly reliable (from what I’ve read and been told), which makes them kind of scary to me. Let me explain…

Assuming that the landlord has enforced the break clause by serving the tenant notice after 6 months into a 12 tenancy agreement. If the tenant stays in the property after the expiry, the landlord will need to issue Court proceedings and ask a Judge to order possession. The Judge will then look at the break clause to see if it is valid. If the Judge is not happy with the clause the landlord will not get possession.

The break clause is one of those clauses that can be drafted and interpreted in many ways (apparently). If the clause is clearly drafted and equally fair to both parties, the landlord will have a better chance of getting possession. However, if the clause is poorly drafted and deemed unfair (e.g. if it is in the favour of the landlord), it is very unlikely that it will be valid. Unfortunately, when the landlord has got to this stage they will have incurred a Court fee of £175 and possible Solicitors costs.

To be fully enforceable in law, break clauses need careful drafting with a high degree of legal expertise – these agreements should be drafted by a solicitor or barrister, or obtained from a known reliable published source.

The preferred alternative to a break clause

Personally, I’d rather just issue my tenant with a 6 month tenancy agreement. That way, even if the tenant fails to vacate after 6 months, the Judge should give me possession immediately because the tenancy has expired, no questions asked.

If after the 6 months tenancy both parties are happy to continue the tenancy, then the tenancy can either roll onto a Periodic Tenancy or a new tenancy agreement can be issued.

Issuing a 6 month tenancy just seems much safer and reliable because there’s little margin for error in comparison.

Surrendering a Tenancy

If a tenancy agreement does not contain a break clause, but both landlord and tenant want to break the tenancy earlier than the fixed date, then they can both surrender the tenancy. This can just be a written document that states both parties agree to terminate the tenancy early, with both parties signatures.

If the landlord does not agree to the surrender, the tenant will be contractually obliged to pay rent for the entire length of the fixed term. If it is the landlord wishing to have the property back, the tenant is entitled to remain in “quiet enjoyment” of the property and the landlord is obliged to follow the statutory termination provisions at the end of the term.

Do you use break clauses?

Do you use a break clause in your tenancy? If so, I’d be interested to see what it says. Would you mind copy/pasting it? Also, has anyone ever enforced the break clause?

Like this post? Then maybe you should sign up to my FREE newsletter so you receive more like it!

40 Comments- join the conversation...

Guest Avatar
YesAdam 12th July, 2011 @ 11:19

Nice Article Landlord.

Six months is not a long time, using a break clause during these seems unreasonable. I have seen it used where a Landlord needs possession to personally live in the property but other than that break clauses should not used on a whim.

On the other side, I was legally advised if a tenant can not use a break clause and leaves the property before the term.
They owe full monies (six month) or until the day that a new tenant moves in. This debt of can be collected, sold or just absorb the deposit.

1
The Landlord Avatar
The Landlord 12th July, 2011 @ 15:55

Hey YesAdam,

Thanks a lot!

I've also heard of cases where the clause has been used so the landlord could move into the property. I actually was going to mention that as an example, but for some reason didn't go through with it.

Yup, tenants are legally obliged to pay rent up until the agreed date if they vacate early. But extracting that money can some times be more hassle than it's worth. If I was in that situation, I would try to recoup the rent, but my main focus would be spent on trying to find new tenants!

Cheers

2
Guest Avatar
Ginster 13th July, 2011 @ 07:20

Is this break clause aka Section 21?
Can this be served alongside the start of a Tenancy Agreement? I'm not too clued up in this area but if it were possible surely it makes sense to?
Say you draw up a 6 month tenancy contract and the Tenant stops paying rent in the second month and this carries on - what do you do?
Would also be interested to hear your views.
Thanks in advance...

3
The Landlord Avatar
The Landlord 13th July, 2011 @ 07:54

Hey Ginster,

No, the break clause is not a Section 21. Although, the landlord should serve a section 21 to break the tenancy if there is a break clause and they wish to terminate the tenancy, if that makes sense.

The section 21 is used to give the tenant notice of possession at the END of the tenancy (or in the middle if there is a break clause). So for example, if you have a 12 month tenancy, you should serve the Section 21 ten months into the tenancy so the tenant knows the landlord wants the property back. A lot of landlords assume that if a tenancy has fixed dates in a tenancy agreement, the tenant HAS to move out on the end date stipulated. That's only true if the landlord serves a section 21, otherwise the tenant is entitled to stay and the contract becomes periodic! The landlord must give at least 2 months notice when serving the section 21. You can serve a section 21 alongside the start of a Tenancy Agreement. But the possession date must be at the end of the fixed date in the tenancy agreement or after, or any time after 6 months if there is break clause.

If your tenant stops paying rent for 2 months at any time, then you should serve a section 8, not section 21!!

The important difference between a Section 8 and Section 21 is that you serve a section 8 when a tenant is in breach of contract e.g. stops paying rent! You only serve a section 21 when the landlord wants to regain possession at the END of a tenancy, and not because the tenant has necessarily done anything wrong.

I hope that makes sense.

4
Guest Avatar
Ginster 13th July, 2011 @ 08:24

@ Landlord.
Thanks for clearing that up!! It makes perfect sense!
Luckily I've never needed to issue a section 8.
Before this conversation I didn't even know what a section 8 was.....'Oooops!!'
Thanks Landlord!
Really appreciate your help.
Thanks for reaching out!! :D

5
Guest Avatar
laura 12th December, 2011 @ 15:19

I have a tennancy agreement on an unfurnished house date 24th June 2011 to 23rd June 2011. The landlord on a whim issued notice for me to leave on the 6th December not quite 6 months giving two months notice to vacate in Febuary. I have been a perfect tennant paid my rent and not broken any clauses in agreement the landlord has evoked a break clause with no reason and is putting it back on market to rent again. Problably to increase rent. This seems completely unjustified and even the neighbours and estate agent have tried to reason with the landlord. Do I have any right in this situation?

6
Guest Avatar
gaynor mcturk 30th March, 2012 @ 17:04

I am in exactly the same situation as Laura above.
Perfect tenant and no breach on contract. I go two months notice after 6 months (break clause) even though they knew I wanted to stay for one year and purchased furniture. Endless problems with things going wrong in apartment and no ok and dandy am being asked to leave so as their brother can move in. A very cold winter flat and they did not supply heating as promised.....I feel as they only gave notice end of 7th month and not after the 4th month as stated above, they are not entitled to get me out.

7
Guest Avatar
Lind 12th August, 2012 @ 11:19

Hi all

My landlady has just written to me telling me that my contract has ended and that I have breached the agreement on the bases that I did not set up arrangements on paying rent o. A different date. I have always paid my rent on the day it falls due or a day before. As I changed jobs and got paid late I laid the kabdlird rent 2 days late last month. This is the reason she states in the contract why the contract is being ended. My contrat us a 12 month one with a 6 month clause. After 4 month it states either party can give motive. I have been here fit 4 months now. Ive heard it is not right for a landlord to give notice for no reason? Please can someone advise me if this is right.

8
Guest Avatar
Clarissa 13th August, 2012 @ 12:33

Hi, I'm looking for some advise. This is what my tenancy agreement says about the 6 month break:

Either party shall have the right to terminate the Tenancy no earlier than at the expiry of the first six month period and at any time thereafter by giving not less than two months notice in writing to that effect. Such notice should be addressed to the Agent: xxxx
Upon the expiration of such Notice this Agreement and everything herein contained shall cease and be void subject nevertheless to the right of the parties in respect of any antecedent breach of any of the covenants or conditions of this Agreement.

Does this mean that I can hand in notice on say the 17th of the month and leave two months later (even though my contract began on the 12th of the month)? Or does it have to be from the 12th I give notice - so I couldn't give notice now until 12th September?

Thanks for any help.

9
Guest Avatar
Raj 27th November, 2012 @ 12:09

I have signed a 6 months contract recently. I started living in the house with my family and a child of 2 years. But now i see all the walls are damping and fungus is growing. The house is getting very very cold and the heaters are not working properly. because of these bad living conditions i want to terminate the contract before 6 months time. is it possible. please urgent

10
Guest Avatar
Aisha 4th December, 2012 @ 02:13

i have recently sign a contract to rent a flat, i have given the estate agent £500 as security deposit and admin fee, i now do not wish to move into the property and told the estate agent about it as well, they first asked me to pay the rent for the whole fixed contracr which is 6 months, but then said if u pay 0ne month rent we will release you from your contract, my question is, if i refuse to rent a property before moving in to the property, do i sill have to pay the money, they are holding the £500 aswell which was towards the admin fee and part deposit money.......CAN ANYONE ADVISE ME ON THAT PLEASE.....

11
Guest Avatar
Aisha 4th December, 2012 @ 02:17

in the agreement, its all about moving out early than the fixed term and nothing mentioned if i refuse to move into the property .... i have signet the tenancy agreement but i m physically not he tenant yet

12
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 4th December, 2012 @ 21:51

Hello Aisha,

You may not like this advice, but...

You have signed a tenancy agreement. You are legally oblidged to fulfil the conditions even though you have not yet moved in.

If you have changed your mind then the law expects the landlord to re-market the property promptly to cut his rental income lost to a minimum. But the landlord can expect you to pay the balancing amount up to what he would have lost.

Bearing in mind December is a very slow month for people taking out new rental agreements, the offer from the agents seems an appropriate approximation of the financial loss you are likely to cause the landlord and are legaly required to pay him.

Whether you have moved in or not is not relevent. Imagine, on moving in day, a landlord said to you they had changed their mind on some whim and you could no longer live there. That would cause you serious grief. The law expects him to hold to his promise of making the flat available to you and it also expects you to follow through on your promise to move in.

13
Guest Avatar
dawson 10th December, 2012 @ 16:17

I have a tenant who made contract minimum live 6 months.
Also I noticed before they moved n do not pa late due day however they paid very late every week after.
Now they live only 2 month and noticed to me just one week before the pay day. In this case should I give back all deposit or not?
Please let me know.
thanks.

14
Guest Avatar
Tangy 23rd July, 2013 @ 11:42

had to shift to another country for work due to which I needed to vacate my accommodation in London two months prior to the end date. I had explained the situation to my landlord over the email. He had first said that I could return my keys and he will then refund the security deposit. I had returned the keys on June 15th.

However, he is now demanding the remaining two-month rent saying there is a no-break clause in my agreement. My lease expires on Aug 25th.

I just wanted to get basic advice if anything can be done in this regard.

Really appreciate it.

Thanks

15
Guest Avatar
Robert 26th July, 2013 @ 18:02

I moved in on an Assured Short-hold tenancy of 1 year from 24 january 2011 to 24 january 2012, then have stayed on ever since on a periodic month to month. The rent is £750.00 a month and I paid £1038 deposit and £750.00 in advance. Therefore I pay rent in advance and my deposit with the agent deposit scheme. I have now been given 2 months notice to quit. So am I still obligated to pay rent over the next 2 months considering I pay one month in advance and they have my deposit? I will need my deposit and rental between this period to move to the next place of abode. Can I just stop paying the rent and move out on the agreed date at the end of the 2nd month? Please help urgently! Thanks

16
Guest Avatar
Aditya Kumar 29th July, 2013 @ 16:11

I entered in AST tenancy agreement on 22nd June 2013 but due to the bad behaviour and idiotic terms of Landlord (he wants to inspect the flat every week for first 3 months) i wanted to surrender the tenancy to which the Landlord refused. I have a 6 month break clause as i had specified to the Agency and Landlord at the on-set itself that i would leave after 6 months. However the break clause is confusing about whether i have to serve the notice of 2 months after the break clause i.e. after 6 months (in which case if will have to vacate after 8 months) or i can serve the notice at the end of 4th month and vacate after end of 6 months. The break Clause is written as follows "This is a 12-month agreement with two month's notice, but also has a 6 month clause two months' notice. This is a 6 months Break Clause where the tenant must give two months notice." So can i leave in 6 months or will i have to stay till 8 months?

17
Guest Avatar
ashleigh 3rd August, 2013 @ 15:38

PLEASE can someone help me i have moved into property 16th feb 2013 its a 12 month assured tenanncy its a two bed house there is me a daughter aged 12 son age 5 my two kids share a room. i am on council list been offered council house. Can i end tennancy on the case that i reported a bedroom double glazed window which is also a firs escape window which will not open and needs lock replacing to be fixed for 5 months now and they still not done it every week im phoning about it chasing it up also i pay 115.00 rent a week where council property been offered is 70.00 so is much more affordably.please can some one help me thank you

18
Guest Avatar
Kayleigh Bennett 6th August, 2013 @ 10:55

We had a 12 month contract with a 6 month break but were under the understanding that the landlord didn't want to do anything with the property and that it's definitely a very long term lent. 4 months in to our lease we got section 21 asking us to vacate on Oct 30th which will being our 7 month here. We have no savings so we have no deposit or reference fees or agency fees to be able to move by October 30th. The agency have lied to us from day one, we've had nothing but trouble with the lettings manager and now we will be homeless with 2 kids under 6 years old! A break clause is a joke and I'll never agree to one again

19
Guest Avatar
karina 24th November, 2013 @ 22:17

Hi, I am French and I paid 6 months rent for a house in London in September and decided not to go back to London after all. I talked to my landlord who told me I could not leave the house within three months and the only way for me to get my money back is if I find a new tenant.
The three months notice is coming to an end and the landlord is not willing to give me my money back unless I find a new tenant.
In France it is illegal not to pay back tenants after the 3 months notice.
I would like to know if he has the right to demand that I find a new tenant before giving me my money back.
Thanks in advance for the help.

20
Guest Avatar
andy 4th December, 2013 @ 19:56

hi ok so we are tenants. we have a 2 year contract with a break clause after 12 months, we now want to/ might need to, use this, but, look to move to a standard form of contract or would have to under the break clause give notice.
Our circumstances have changed and we might be having to move in 2 months February (Work related) if not though we want to stay were we are we have been in the village for 6 years and would happily stay for another if this opportunity falls through.
we would know by the first week of january so timing is bad or good which ever way but can't be stuck for another year paying rent if we do move.
What is the legal situation our year break clause is December 29th we will know by january 7th so one side says we can't miss the opportunity so will have to give the notice by the 29th december but with 2 young children we can't afford to move and keep paying the rent but can't again be homeless which is what will happen if the new work doesn't happen.

21
Guest Avatar
dawn 11th December, 2013 @ 09:56

Hi i need some advice please, i had a 12 month tenancy started on feb 8th 2013 and in the tenancy this included a break out clause i was required to give the landlord one months notice on the rent due date. i have done this and paid all my rent up to date and left the property in a very good state considering reason for moving was extreme damp which caused me to be ill and i have been referred to a chest specialist. i have not heard anything back from the estate agents yet regarding deposit am i still entilted to receive my deposit back as i owe no money and they cannot put tenants in the property until they sort out the damp problem which i had been contacting them about for months ????

22
Guest Avatar
ashleigh 11th December, 2013 @ 10:06

To dawn yes you are entitled for your full deposit back. Did you get a certificate that your bond was paid into a bond security account. Basically it will state that your bond was paid to a specfic company and there contact details. You would normally have to wait 10 days after you have moved out of the property. Also have you had your last walk around inspection? As long as all is left clean tidy reasonable condition and monies paid you are entitled to get your bond/deposit back hope this helps

23
Guest Avatar
Valentino 11th December, 2013 @ 13:14

My 2 year tenancy has expired oktober 2008, ever since I pay my rent every month. Now suddenly (more then 5 years later) my landlord is asking me to sign a new tenancy of 2 years with an "break clause" from 1 month for both parties.
Wy I do need a new tenancy? and what's in it for me?
If I don't sign what are my rights?

24
Guest Avatar
Aditya Kumar 11th December, 2013 @ 14:16

If you have left the property with proper break clause (and if they have acknowledged it) and they had not protected your deposit with and Deposit schemes you can report the matter to "Tenancy Relationship officer (sometimes called as Landlord/ Tenant mediation officer)" of your concil or can even approach court in which case you will get your entire deposit back (irrespective of in what condition you have handed the property back) plus some compensation as well (which can be upto three times the deposit value.

25
Guest Avatar
Valentino 11th December, 2013 @ 15:58

Over the years, new regulations have been passed through I know. Point being, My landlord allowed the contract to continually be periodic for a long period of time (5 years), it can slowly become out of date.

When becomes a contract out of date?

Thanks in advance!

26
Guest Avatar
lemonroyale 6th January, 2014 @ 18:11

Can you tell me what this means please?
My clause!

"Both parties have the right to terminate the tenancy at the end of the first six month period only from the commencement date by giving not less than two months notice (at the end of month four) in writing to that effect and upon the expiration of such notice this agreement and everything herein contained shall cease and be void subject nevertheless to the right of parties in respect of any antecedent breach of any of the covenants herein contained."

Does this mean i can only leave at 6months in and 12months in? Or does it mean i can leave any time after 6months (giving 2months notice) ?

thanks!

27
Guest Avatar
PRERNA 14th January, 2014 @ 14:17

Hi,

I have a Question.

My landlord has used a break clause and has given us a notice period of 60 days ending in March 2014.

Now I have found a house within 15 days and the new landlord wants us to move immediately.

Does it means that I have to pay rent for both the places as I will be shifting in new house immediately.

28
Guest Avatar
Rohit 9th February, 2014 @ 23:28

Hi,

I need a advice if anybody can ,
My 6 month contract is ending on 27 -FEB-2014 and I have served the notice to Agency on 31-JAN-2014 that I am vacating the property on 27-FEB-2014.
My rent pay date is 31St of Each Month ( 30 for odd months)
Now the agency is asking me to stay till march -14 as I have servered the notice on 31-JAn (which is start of next rental period) so my 1 month notice will be considered in next month (march-14)
Is it right ? or agency is just trying to making money from me ? can I vacate the property on 27th Feb?
Any advise / help is much appriciated.

Thanks

29
Guest Avatar
Aditya 10th February, 2014 @ 13:08

Hi Rohit,

Was your contract for 6 months only? Was it ending on 27th Feb 2014? If it was then, I guess, you do not even have to give the notice. And yes you can vacate on 27th Feb. However, if your contract was longer and you want to break your contract in between using the break clause then you should have given the notice little earlier (on or before 27th Jan 2014). You just got late by 3-4 days and the Agency can indeed ask you to stay longer (Could you please provide the exact wordings of your break clause and the notice period).

Regards,
Aditya

30
Guest Avatar
Jeffery 3rd March, 2014 @ 15:43

I have three bedroom house and rented it out to couple with one small kid. Inside my tenancy agreement I have 6 month break clause and 12 month fixed tenancy.

When visiting the property within 2 month I was surprised he converting the leaving room into his bedroom and all the other room his renting out to different families. I have notice a lot of weir and tear. can I invoke the break clause.

How hard would it be to evict them. Does it have tendancy to drag through court.

Please The family passed credit and landlord reference before moving in.

31
Guest Avatar
Gabriel 16th March, 2014 @ 17:17

I'm a tenant. I signed for a 2 year Tenancy Agreement with a break clause after the first 12 months. After 10 months the Landlord has given me a 2 months notice to leave the property. Can he do that or he should have to wait until month 12 to submit that notice?

Is this notice valid even if we had a verbal agreement to stay at the property for the first 24 months?

What would happen in case I cannot leave the property on due date? Due to personal issues I might need to stay for 2 more months.

Many thanks,

Gabriel.

32
Guest Avatar
danielle 7th May, 2014 @ 16:25

We have a house that is rented out in Feb for a year which appears their is no break clause informed by the estate agent I can only give notice at 10months, my partner since this has walked out leaving me and two young boys, now selling the house we are in I need to be able to move the boys back to the rented house with as less duress as possible , I am concerned we will be homeless for a while between houses if I can not get the tenants out, I don't want these boys shoved pillor to post ..is there anything ANYTHING at all I can do to get these tenants out early from this contract? Thank you any advice much appreciated

33
Guest Avatar
Claire 14th May, 2014 @ 13:10

I'm in such a tricky place right now. The basics are that on 19th July 2013 we signed a 6 month tenancy. Few hick ups along the way but the estate agents did sort things out, but with no care to us. They just dealt with things and clearly displayed their annoyance on the way. 19th June 2013 arrives and we receive a letter stating we had to contact them with payment to renew the lease if that's what we wanted to do or issue them with 1 months notice if we wanted to leave. The weekend on 19th July we attend their office and paid £80 and renewed for another 6 months but this time they had increased the rent by £25.00

Now here comes the interesting bit. On Sunday 4th May we had a leak in our living room. We informed the management and our estate agent and we was reassured that while we was away for the week someone would attend the flat to assess and fix.

When we returned on friday 9th May we was told that the agents would be sent in out a contractor to fix the damage (paint the ceiling as the leak had stopped) and that the flat above us had denied all knowledge of a leak.

Sunday at 3 am in the morning we was awoken to our fire alarms going off. The short story is that 2 flats above us had left their tap running for a few hours and between 3 am and 6 am we had an indoor waterfall. The damage is that bad that it is going to be an insurance claim. And we all know how slow those things can be.

Now the property is livable and other than the electrics need check (which he estate agents keep saying oh they will be fine don't worry) visibly all the damage seems to be to the ceiling by way of dirty water marks. Also the fire alarm system is shot and need looking at which is being done today.

The smell in the flat is horrific, and can only be compared to that of an open sewer. It is to the point that we are sustaining headache and it is waking us up during the night.

Over the past couple of days we have decided that we want out of their asap. However our agreement isn't until 18th July. We can't put up with that that long. The estate agents are simply saying their is nothing they can do as it is an insurance claim and it could take anything from weeks to months. ........

What legal stance do we have to get out?

We don't have a break clause in our agreement, however I did find that in both agreement a paragraph that states within the first 12 months of occupancy they will jot increase the rent, however they did this upon renewal of the contract. I'm wondering if this is our way out? But these estate agents can talk their way out of a paper bag. I'm almost certain they will say that this doesn't count as it's a new contract.

I'm dreading going home to that smell again and don't know how much longer we can put up with it.

Please help?

34
Guest Avatar
Claire 16th May, 2014 @ 00:07

Just an update as to what's happened today.

A dehumidifier has been installed and I have been told I will be Reimbursed for the electrical cost of its use. It is getting rid of water and of the smell slowly which is great news.

However we are still sick with worry and want out. I've read the lease again to say and it turns out that the wording of the first 6 month lease was £425 rent plus additional £25 for parking and the 2nd 6 month lease says £475 rent and mentions nothing about the parking.

So in black and white it states that in the first 6 months the rent has increased by £50 a month, however it states that the rent will not be increased in the first 12 months.

Am I right in saying goes that :

A) they have breached part of the contract, and
B) they owe me £50 for each month paid over the initial 6 months (£200 soon to be £250 on Monday when the rent is due)

Again any help would be gratefully appreciated!

Many thanks

35
Guest Avatar
David 2nd June, 2014 @ 14:51

@Claire you are right, your landlord is failing to provide you with habitable accomodation. On that basis he is in breach of contract.

You have to determine how that affects you, if 25% of the property is affected then you would deduct 25% of the rent.

I would not accept being charged for parking, it is an old trick and I would reject it.

I think it is reasonable for you to leave and say that due to the breach the contract is void. If they want to take you to Court they can try but Court fees increased recently and considering they will be able to claim in their insurance I would just go.

A judge is not going to expect you to live in substandard property. You are still entitled to your deposit back as this has nothing to do with you damaging flat. If they try to take it complain to deposit holders.

36
Guest Avatar
claire 2nd June, 2014 @ 15:04

I wrote them a letter last week (recorded delivery) stating that they have breached their contract in charging us 50 a month more and therfore we expect this money to be returned to us immediately along with confirmation that the remaining months rent will be reduced to 425 a month, but they haven't been in touch.

I've been told I've got more than a fighting chance in court and judge would rule in my favour, but not to sure how to go about it. I'm thinking write them another letter demanding a response in 7 days or ill issue a small claim against them? My understanding is that as the amount is below 300 it will only cost 25-35 in fees??

37
Guest Avatar
David 3rd June, 2014 @ 15:59

A firmly worded letter saying that you require an immediate refund or you will be forced to hold the money from rent (if you are going to stay) in "lien" for the alleged debt and that money will be paid to a 3rd party.

You tell them you wish to avoid legal action but will be forced to file a County Court claim if they do not provide the refund promptly. Give them 14 days, send two copies, one via normal mail and one by recorded a day later. Explain that if you are forced to go to Court you will have to claim for your full costs including consequential loss as you have given them the opportunity to avoid the legal action.

If you go to Court you pay the disputed sum into Court so the Judge can see you have not gone on a spending spree but paid a proportion of money you owe taken as a lien on money they owe you.

Personally I think you are being very reasonable, if a ceiling falls in and there is damp you can get ill from mould and the place is not habitable.

You should leave and let them claim on their insurance who will in turn claim in the idiot upstairs.

38
Guest Avatar
claire 5th June, 2014 @ 16:24

Need help again guys.

Just talking about the rental contract at the moment, forgetting any damage to the property in relation to the flood.

I sent a letter to the estate agents saying that I believed they have breached their contract in charging more in and that I wanted the money back basically.

They have written back to me and said that due to shortage of good quality letting particularly in Bradford they quiet rightly raised the rent by £25 a month and we were more than willing at the time. (At he time we didn't have a choice and we didn't know that they had a clause in their contract stating they wouldn't up the rent)

They say that they will not return any money to us and that as per their t&c the rent is 475 and we are obliged to pay.

Then at the end they say

'Obviously upon the expiration of your present tenancy if you feel you no longer wish to renew we have immediately available prospective tenants willing to take over the property'

In other words 'If you don't like it then leave'

I'm absolutely ragging inside yet I don't know what to do next? Surely they can't do this?????

39
Guest Avatar
Caramoochie 24th August, 2014 @ 08:06

I have a question about the effect a period tenancy has on the DPS. My understanding is the DPS has to be registered every time a new tenancy is entered into. So if a tenant has a 6 month tenancy and then enters into a 12 month tenancy after the initial tenancy a new DPS has to be registered. Is this the case with a periodic tenancy - effectively every month the tenancy could either be extended or it could be viewed as a new monthly tenancy being entered into. What if anything do you need to do about the DPS and periodic tenancies? At the very minimum I think it would need to be registered at the start of the periodic tenancy as this is a change in the tenancy agreement, albeit the tenancy continues. The risks to the Landlord are obvious - get it wrong and risk a fine 3 x the amount of the deposit! I would welcome your expert thoughts The Landlord.

40

Please leave a comment...

I'm a nobody

I'm a nobody

Landlord

Landlord

Tenant

Tenant

Letting / Estate Agent

Letting / Estate Agent

Legal

Legal

Buyer

Buyer

Developer

Developer

Enthusiast

Enthusiast


Leave a comment

Want FREE Landlord/Tenant advice from experienced Landlords?

Join our active Landlord community by registering to our Landlord Forum.
Learn, share and resolve your problems!