Landlord’s Right Of Entry

Landlord's Right Of Entry

It is in fact illegal for a landlord or agent to enter the property without permission from the tenant. Ultimately, a landlord has no right of entry unless the tenant grants them access or the landlord is given permission by the courts.

The office of fair trading document oft356 reads as follows:

3.32 We would object to a provision giving the landlord an excessive right to enter the rented property. Under any kind of lease or tenancy, a landlord is required by common law to allow his tenants ‘exclusive possession’ and ‘quiet enjoyment’ of the premises during the tenancy. In other words, tenants must be free from unwarranted intrusion by anyone, including the landlord. Landlords are unfairly disregarding that basic obligation if they reserve a right to enter the property without giving reasonable notice or getting the tenant’s consent, except for good reason.

Irrespective of what maybe written in the agreed contract between a landlord and a tenant (e.g. a clause that states the landlord is allowed to enter the property without permission), it is still the tenant’s statutory right to live in quiet enjoyment, therefore any clauses that conflicts with that right will not be legally enforceable.

A landlord does have the right to ‘reasonable’ access to carry out repairs for which they are responsible, but they still always need to ask for the tenant’s permission, and give at least 24 hours notice. As far as I’m aware, only under a situation that can be deemed as an “emergency” may the Landlord enter without permission. This will include situations like flooding or fire.

Harassment

Tenants have the right to live without unnecessary interference from the landlord, and also prevent them or anyone on behalf of the landlord to enter the premises. If a landlord disregards the law and enters the property without permission, they could be prosecuted for “harassment”

The law that sets out the definition of harassment in this context is the Protection from Eviction Act 1977::

The landlord of a residential occupier or an agent of the landlord shall be guilty of an offence if—

(a) he does acts likely to interfere with the peace or comfort of the residential occupier or members of his household, or

(b) he persistently withdraws or withholds services reasonably required for the occupation of the premises in question as a residence,

and (in either case) he knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, that that conduct is likely to cause the residential occupier to give up the occupation of the whole or part of the premises or to refrain from exercising any right or pursuing any remedy in respect of the whole or part of the premises.

The important take away for landlords, just because you don’t believe your actions to be a form of harassment, it doesn’t mean that the law would agree with you. So be diligent.

Some of the most common complaints of landlord harassment that I hear about are as follows:

  • My landlords keeps calling me for rent
  • My landlord wants an inspection every month, it’s too much
  • My landlord keeps threatening to throw me out unless I pay rent
  • My landlord keeps entering the property without my permission

In reality, it can often be difficult to prosecute a landlord for harassment. Harressment cases are usually handled by the local authrity, not the police. Most of the high damages are awarded in civil cases, where the tenant has taken the landlord to court for breaking their statutory right of Quiet Enjoyment This means that the landlord should leave tenants to live in the property in peace!

My tenant won’t allow me access

If you’re in the unfortunate possession of being refused access to your property, whether it be for a regular inspection or maintenance work, find out what options are available and what steps to take next over at the “My Tenant won’t let me into the property” blog post.

Legal advice

If you require legal advice on the matter, I highly recommend contacting your local Citizens Advice for free legal advice!

Like this post? Then maybe you should sign up to my FREE newsletter so you receive more like it!

498 Comments- join the conversation...

Showing 448 - 498 comments (out of 498)
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 7th February, 2015 @ 18:04

Hi everyone,
My Landlord, at the end of the AST informed me he was going to increased the rent by £100 but didnt renew the tenancy. Then he changed his mind and gave me an eviction letter to vacate the property in a month. Then i realised that a month was very short as i am finding hard to find another place to move in into. I told him, and he gave me another further month, so i have to leave the property on the 08 of March. But now he wants ti inspect the property. I think it is still a bit short for me as i am struggling to find another place, and on top of that he wants to gain access to the property to inspect it. I find it too soon for inspection when i still have another month to go.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated

448
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 7th February, 2015 @ 18:07

I have four small children so that is even tougher to find a property that can accomodate all of us. Do you think the landlord should give us at least 3 months notice? Or not

449
Guest Avatar
James 8th February, 2015 @ 16:40

Madelyn
Firstly only a court order can 'evict' you - not the landlord. A court will only provide an eviction notice if your landlord has issued a VALID section 21 Notice (i.e. the notice he needs to serve to end your tenancy and for you to move out).

If the Section 21 Notice is invalid in any way you cannot be evicted. In short it sounds likely that your landlord has not followed the correct procedures to gain possession under a Section 21. If he provided you 1 month's notice the Section 21 notice is INVALID as he is required by law to give you 2 month's notice. He would then need to issue a NEW Section 21 Notice (he can't back date it!) with the correct 2 months notice. Suggest you read this document here: https://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/386451/Is_your_section_21_notice_valid_Jan2014.pdf

In terms of the entry for inspection, there is likely to be something in your contract - in terms of your right to refuse entry the multiple posts above discuss this issue in detail and the various pros and cons of refusing entry to your landlord.

450
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 8th February, 2015 @ 16:59

Thank you James very much. I just need a roof under my head dear but I am struggling to find one, hence i really need more time to be honest.
I think you are right.
The whole thing was loke this:
The landlord gave me an eviction letter that says that he wanted to move in with his family so he gave me until the 4 of February to move (1 month).
I told him that one month is too short, that i needed time to find a proper place to move in to.
He then wrote another one giving me another month. Which expire on the 4 of March. So that is including the first month he already gave me.
He, as you said is not giving me the right letter.

If i am following you, he should have given me two months straight the second time he wrote the letter. But he gave one month.

Do you think i should write to him and ask him to give me the correct letter following the section 21.
I dont want any trouble that is the thing and i am quite scare about h making any fuss that he gave me 2 month already. What do you think?

451
Guest Avatar
James 8th February, 2015 @ 17:26

Madelyn
The two months start when he serves you a VALID Section 21. He is the landlord this is HIS responsibility to do correctly. I am only stating what the law requires - it is there for both your protection and his. As it stands if he hasn't served you with a valid Section 21 and come 4th March you refuse to leave, he is stuck as if he applies to a court to have you evicted they will throw his case out telling him to issue a VALID Section 21 - which would start on whatever date after the 4th March that he finally gets his act together. So then he's left with you leaving on the 4th of May at the very earliest. (in effect it would be later as he'd never be able to arrange a court hearing that quickly)

To be honest he sounds like an amateur or maybe he's just an idiot - or both. Either way he's not above the law so don't let him intimidate you. When he learns to do his job properly then he can expect things to run a bit more smoothly.

452
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 8th February, 2015 @ 17:56

James,
I salute you, you are a star. I just need a bit of time to find a proper place for me and my babies, that is all. And i think with what i learned here i can really call him and explain to him so that he realised that he needs to learn the business properly and then he would give me the right letter.

When i rented the property, there was another landlord. He bought the property from his relative, but he never inspected the property at all after buying it. We kept the house spotless but the walls are very durty because we have been living there for almost 6 years. He didnt give us anything for the property, but then he wants to inspect. Inspect what you think? He does not even know what was in the property when we moved in or if we needed anything after he bought it.
We never disturbed him or his uncle for anything. Does he really has to inspect the property? Do you think he has the right to take money from our deposit to buy pains for the walls and doors?

James i think i am also an idiot when it comes to these things, and i am sorry for asking so many questions. I appreciated very much.
Thank you

453
Guest Avatar
James 9th February, 2015 @ 16:59

Madelyn
Inspections are a normal part of the termination of tenancy process, though any matters related to your deposit should be based on the inspection that would occur just before (within a day or two) of you vacating - typically the day you leave.

You need to read this: http://www.depositprotection.com/legislation

It is a legal requirement for your landlord to hold your deposit with the DPS - If he has not done so then any Section 21 Notice he serves will not be valid.

454
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 9th February, 2015 @ 17:20

Thank you James very much.
I think this is getting interesting by the minute.

The Landlord wants to do an inspection a month before we vacate the house. I dont mind inspection, i understand it is the normal process. But know i know that it has to be a few days before we vacate and not a month like he wants to do.

Another thing is: what about if my deposit us not protected? What do i need to do? Do i still get my deposit?
If the section 21 is not valid due to the fact that my deposit is not protected with DPS, what would happens then?

Oh my oh my

455
Guest Avatar
Ruth 10th February, 2015 @ 10:01

Hi,

My land lord sent us a message this morning, detailing this exactly 'hi, i totally forgot to message you about taking a handy man over today to look at the fence and the damp at 10:15, hope thats ok?'

We have a broken fence, and some mould in the walls (which is not a damp issue for one, its the bricks, they need replacing but she refuses to admit it..

when we replied saying we were at work, she said

'I am taking him round, be there in 10 mins'

how many rules is this violating as its not fair, 10 minutes, whilst walking to work is not enough time to prepare for that!

help will be grateful as she is being a pain at the moment.

456
Guest Avatar
James 10th February, 2015 @ 16:01

Madelyn - my last message could be somewhat misleading for a property that has not had inspection in many years. If your landlord is wanting to let the property to others after you leave then I'd say an inspection about a month before you leave gives a chance for him to prepare for any renovations or repairs that may be needed and is not in itself unreasonable. My previous message was really related to properties that have had regular inspections throughout the tenancy and the landlord is aware of the likely condition of the property.

Regarding your deposit you need to read the information on the DPS website. If your deposit should be with the DPS but isn't it means that a court won't issue an eviction notice against an invalid Sect 21 - ultimately your landlord cannot have you legally evicted - doesn't mean he couldn't try by other means but he'd be risking tenant harassment.

Ruth - read the posts above! No ifs, no buts, your landlord needs to give you 24hrs notice. External areas of the property do not count. But if they need to come through the front door to access these areas then it's 24hrs notice.

457
Guest Avatar
Madelyn 10th February, 2015 @ 16:27

I appreciate your responses and help James very much.
So if i understand your explanation:
The Landlord has to give me a letter asking for the property back. This letter has to be under section 21, as it was at the end of the AST because he didnt renew the tenancy, he gave me a letter requesting to vacate the property.
But that letter under section 21 has to say that he is giving me at least 2 months to vacate the property.
An inspection is ok a month in advace if he wants to rent to another tenant.

I understand and agree with that.

Now in my situation:
The landlord wants the house to move in himself, as explained on his letter.

When he gave me the tenancy agreement, he mention the section 21, but never followed it when he gave me the letter to vacate the property.
He gave me a month first, then after i told him that the time he is giving me is too short, he then gave me another letter adding another month. ( he didnt follow the section 21 here)
When he realised his mistake he would have given me 2 month straight, but he didnt, he backdated the letter instead and gave me another month.

Do you think it's ok if i contact him and ask him to kindly give me a correct letter under section 21, without backdating the date, in order for me to vacate the property.
I dont want to come across as a trouble maker, i just want time to be able to find proper accomodation for me and the kids, and the money to pay for it.

Regards,
Madelyn

458
Guest Avatar
Louise 15th February, 2015 @ 16:02

I have handed in my notice on my tenancy which ends this month, I have moved out of the property as we have relocated to Spain. However I have returned after 2 weeks to spend a week getting the property cleaned etc ready for my handover to the letting agency only to discover that someone has entered the property and removed some of my personal items! Suggestions welcome on where I go from here as well as reporting it to the police

459
Guest Avatar
James 16th February, 2015 @ 06:08

Louise
As simple as this may seem, don't you think your first port of call should be with the letting agent or your landlord to find out exactly who entered the property and removed your belongings?
Whoever did remove the items had no right to do so.

460
Guest Avatar
lucy 19th February, 2015 @ 20:47

can a landlord enter your home without you knowing . look through your fridge and cupboards and comment about thngs bein out of date. and if thehouse is a little untidy . i have been in hospital due to a difficult pregnancy and this has stressed me out

461
Guest Avatar
James 20th February, 2015 @ 10:20

Lucy - in a word; No!

462
Guest Avatar
gary 21st February, 2015 @ 15:13

My partner for private reasons decided to rent her small terraced house out for just six months this period expired in december last since his occupation he has refused my partner access to collect personal property and has not paid rent since october. he refuses to answer corrospodence. he is breeding dogs in the house. The dogs are allowed to run freely and have been seen on the furniture. It is believed he is trashing the house. He has form for the same behaviour. what can we do

463
Guest Avatar
maz 28th February, 2015 @ 16:30

We have been issued with a section 21 notice, the landlord is selling the property. We are renting via letting agents. We both work but a low income family with 3 children. We have always paid our rent and have inspections every four months we have lived here just over 4 years. We are in between a rock and a hard place, we can't afford to pay the rent here and get a deposit etc together for a new place but if we don't pay the rent here we are penalised via a reference. We suspect we will have trouble getting our deposit back because the landlord/letting agent have consistently tried to bully us into making repairs which are not part of our contract and to redecorate over the damp/ mould which persists throughout the property. At the moment we are in the situation where we cannot have the lights on at the fuse box because a burning smell is coming from the light sockets. We had to involve housing enforcement over a year ago because of our defective heating system and the at risk fuse box needed replacing and had been ignored for over 2 years of our tenancy. We have been on a periodic tenancy for the past 2 and a half years. Housing enforcement have been useless as they did not get everything repaired as the landlord was threatening eviction and there is not enough social housing. Neither can we afford hostels etc because we work. So can someone please clarify if we don't pay our rent so we can get a deposit etc for an other home during our 2 months notice. What could happen? Also can the letting agent just let themselves into the property without any notice even if we have been given the section 21. Thank you

464
Guest Avatar
James 2nd March, 2015 @ 10:47

Maz
Your post raises a number of points beyond the remit of this article. However, being brief: Check that your deposit is with the DPS and ensure all other aspects of the Section 21 are valid. Read posts 450 - 457 above.

The serving of a Section 21 (or Sect. 8) does not change in any way the Landlord's right of entry. Until the Landlord gains possession then your rights remain the same - regardless of whether rent is outstanding or any other reason. If you stop paying rent and refuse to move out then you will be in breach of contract and the landlord can take legal action against you to have you evicted, recover the owed rent or both. But this process would take time (many weeks) and during this time your landlord/agent has no additional right of entry.

The issues you describe regarding poor maintenance or unsafe services within the property are unlikely to directly influence any ultimate eviction, but (depending on the actual evidence and records you've kept) may weaken the landlord's claim on unpaid rent in any subsequent court hearing.

465
Guest Avatar
gary 9th March, 2015 @ 08:10

I left a message 463 above. has no one got an answer it seems everyone wants to jump to the defence of the poor tenant but no one wants to jump to the defence of the poor landlord who on this occasion happens to be a hard working woman who was forced to let her house for just six months. She did this because she had been made redundant and she did not to throw herself on to state handouts while she was looking for another job. Her house is now occupied by a worthless low life who knows the ropes and is determined to exploit every avenue in order to live rent free and carry on his dog breeding business inside the house. Is this justice?

466
Guest Avatar
Joann 9th March, 2015 @ 08:38

Gary
Was the house rented out through an agent? Or was it rented out between two people with no formal documents?
Perhaps you should be visiting a solicitor or contacting the free legal advice team at Shelter.

467
Guest Avatar
James 9th March, 2015 @ 13:59

Gary
The majority of posts here relate to the defence of tenants rights as they are outlined by law. On this forum at least I don't see any more evidence of Poor Tenants over Poor Landlords. In fact what seems fairly apparent is that in many cases described above, problems seem to have been caused by amateur landlords who've clearly entered the property lettings arena with very little understanding of their legal responsibility's and under the misguided view that letting their property carries little or no financial risk. That is not a defence or excuse for poor tenants just a statement of fact.

When you ask if anyone has an answer to the situation you describe, I'm not sure what you're expecting? While I'm sure many on here including myself sympathise with your position, I can only assume that you are perusing your available avenues to get this tenant evicted (Explained in the most basic terms here: https://www.gov.uk/evicting-tenants/overview)? If you are looking for some other legal avenue then you are going to be somewhat disappointed I'm afraid, although your agent (if you have one) or solicitor should at least be able to direct the process and hopefully minimise the time taken to eventually regain possession.

468
Guest Avatar
Rach 9th March, 2015 @ 16:12

Gary if the property had been let following the correct procedures - proper tenancy agreement with the stipulation that dogs are not allowed on the property, etc. plus a proper inventory done. Your gf should be serving the correct eviction papers to start the eviction process, if she wishes to evict the tenant.

Please read up on the law and guidance surrounding the lettings and evictions process. If your gf did not do that, or are unable to understand all that, then spend some money on a solicitor. If your gf wanted to do DIY-letting on her own, surely she should have been well-versed in the laws and guidance surrounding this. Otherwise she should have enlisted the services of a lettings agent in the first place to ensure the proper procedures were followed in the first place, to simply ensure her ass was covered right from the start, so that if things go wrong, she knows how to minimise her losses.

Your tenant knows the law better than your gf, is it? Well this should not have been the case. DIY-letting of personal property is not something that should be taken lightly to make a fast buck. Your gf should have started off just as well-versed in the law as her tenant is.

It's not a case of "poor landlord" here, but rather an imbalance of knowledge between landlord and tenant. Which could have been prevented if landlord arms himself with ample knowledge in the first place.

And even if one is well versed in law, that is no bulletproof protection against financial loss. I know the law pretty well but in the past I have done on occasion to just suck it up and make some losses because I decided it was simply not worth the time, cost or hassle to, for example, contest a less-than-£100 deduction off my deposit a previous landlord wanted unjustly.

469
Guest Avatar
jools 10th March, 2015 @ 14:22

Gary,

the posts above are all correct. You GF is not going to get this tenant out without spending some money and the cost depends on how complicated the matter is ie, did she protect the deposit, was a correctly worded AST agreement in force etc. If the AST is deemed to be an unfair contract then she is facing a long battle.

Even IF she gains a court order she is then going to have to pay for court appointed bailiffs to perform the eviction. Time span? 6 months or more.

This is the problem with accidental landlords. It's very easy to say I will rent out my place to get some money but unless you are familiar with even the most basic issues surrounding housing law or renting you are going to come spectacularly unstuck and it's going to cost plenty of money to put it right, as well as frustration, and misery.

Sorry if it's not what you wanted to hear.

Jools

BTW, it is an unfair contract term to say someone can't have a pet unless there is a reasonable reason for not doing so, ie a great dane in a one bedroom flat or a tiger etc. By using the phrase no pets, no smoking, no spongers etc is (and I am open to correction here) deemed to be an unfair term and it can negate ANY AST in place leaving the landlord open to legal redress by the person the unfair contract term has harmed.

470
Guest Avatar
Sean 31st March, 2015 @ 09:38

My landlords have served me with a two month eviction notice and have given me 24 hours notice to inspect the property. I have recently had an operation on my back and to be honest, the flat is a bit of a mess as I'm struggling to keep on top of things and I'd rather they didn't inspect as I'm not up to it, and as things are a bit frosty in our relationship, I don't want a confrontation.

As part of our agreement I've agreed to redecorate the flat, ready for new tenants which I have a month to do. I don't mind doing this as I have let the flat get pretty scruffy knowing that redecoration would happen anyway. Do I gave the right to refuse my landlords entry?

471
Guest Avatar
stacey 15th April, 2015 @ 14:47

I am a land lord, and I need to gain access to my property as the roof has caved in through the bathroom ceiling. I had this cleaned up ect, but the repairs still need to be done. My tenant said we are not allowed into the property to do the repairs, which if not done, will cause more damage from rain coming in. He has also stopped paying rent. Please advise me if we can enter the property for repairs as we do have keys, thanks

472
Guest Avatar
James 15th April, 2015 @ 15:14

So is your tenant happy sitting in the bath under the rain?!

I think a reasonable person would agree this constituted 'emergency' access and it would be reasonable to enter the property to make the roof safe, the room habitable and prevent further property damage.

Though I don't think the fact that the tenant has stopped paying rent is actually material to how you can or should proceed in this matter.

473
Guest Avatar
Leon 17th April, 2015 @ 15:28

Hi,
if the landlord access to my flat without 24notice is that ok to do? I was so mad because first time I was naked and when I ask them they said there did'nt give a notice because they have 50 property to take care of which I felt like stolen please any advice for me what to do

474
Guest Avatar
James 17th April, 2015 @ 15:35

Leon
If the landlord has 50 properties, he should very well know that he is required by law to provide 24 hours notice! If they turn up again without notice do not let them enter or tell them to leave.

475
Guest Avatar
Leon 17th April, 2015 @ 16:50

Thank you for a quick answer James! I don't feel safe or affraid of my belonging could be stolen, in this case can you claim or do anything more then that? I don't want any problem or stress but they seem very rude! If it happens again where can contact or get help from thank you so much

476
Guest Avatar
Hayley 27th May, 2015 @ 20:25

Hi, i could do with some advice please, the property i have been a tenant in for almost 4yrs.. none of the repairs ive reported over the years have EVER been sorted by the landlord ive ended up getting repairs done and paying for them myself. The letting agency fob me off with the same excuse that they dont deal with my property repairs as the landlord has his own maintenance team ..they will inform him of the repairs. Then i get fed up ringing up. Anyway.. every 6months the letting agency attend the property for inspection and list any repairs etc. (Not that anything comes of the list). Recently they arranged to visit for next inspection and i told them how pointless i felt the inspections were and that i wanted the landlord to visit the property with the agency. This was arranged for yesterday. Along with the gas safety inspection. However..the day before the visit the agency rung to rearrange for next month and confirmed the gas man was still coming (yesterday). I waited.. and no one came. I received a distressed call from my son at 2pm today saying him and my younger son were upstairs scared as someone was in the property. As expected i rushed home in a state of panic and it was the gas engineer who had let himself into the property?? I calmed my 9yr old son down and i asked the man to leave the property as my son was upset and he threatened to cut off my gas supply as he had a legal duty to do a test. This is wouldve been ok had he visited when arranged and i was there. but not when im not there and had no notice of him being given keys, its really made me mad as my sons were home and it has caused unnecessary upset.

477
Guest Avatar
Jackie 31st May, 2015 @ 08:11

Hi, our landlords Mail keeps being posted at our home despite us telling him to stop his mail. We have lived here for nearly three years now. Is this classed as harassment.

478
Guest Avatar
James 1st June, 2015 @ 10:18

Hayley - this is clearly not acceptable, firstly the appointment should have been kept and if not possible you should have been notified. At the very least he should have rung the doorbell!

Jackie - I'm not really sure this can be classed as harassment. How often is your landlord turning up to collect his mail? If frequently (and without notice) then you could have a point, but the simple act of having wrongly addressed mail delivered through your letterbox is pushing the definition I think. You should explain to your Landlord that you are not happy with this ongoing situation and give him a choice: the mail will simply be binned or you will set up a postal redirect to his correct address and deduct the cost of this from your monthly rent. Unless he has a specific reason for wanting mail delivered there, then it seems likely it is simply at the bottom of his priority list and he's just being a bit lazy.

479
Guest Avatar
Jackie 1st June, 2015 @ 18:15

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question, much appreciated.

480
Guest Avatar
Pete 5th June, 2015 @ 10:13

I have something of an odd problem. I'm living in an AST for a year, coming up to the end of the contract (July 31st). Our landlord has decided, after failing to re-let the property, to remodel it by converting the built-in garage on the ground floor into a bedroom. We were notified of this verbally only. Our contract specifies the landlord is only entitled to access the property for inspection and routine maintenance, not to alter the property, though we did give verbal consent.

We have a few problems arising from this:

- We received absolutely no written notice (not even so much as a text or e-mail) about the work before it started. Workmen just showed up one day to start work. No one even knocked on our door to let us know. Our contract explicitly states conditions for proper notice (a letter by 1st class post).
- Work takes places on a schedule inconvenient for us (loud drilling as early as 8am when I occasionally work late night shifts running until 5am!), and seemingly randomly.
- Private property (including three bicycles) belonging to us has been moved to a neighbouring house, also let by the landlord. We were given the opportunity to recover it by the builders but only AFTER they had moved it. We have no way of recovering our property on our own. We were not advised at all about when our property would have to move, verbally or in writing.
- Workmen have been given keys to access the house and come and go at their pleasure. Again, no permission was sought or notice given. They literally just turn up and come in the door at 8am.
- The landlord has taken this opportunity to randomly come to the house and inspect things without warning. Additional work has been carried out on the house, and workmen have moved into parts of the house beyond the garage.
- Part of the reason we rented the house was for the storage space in the garage. As a result of its loss, we have had to move our bicycles inside to recover them after they were moved. Storing bikes in the property is an explicit violation of the contract - but what else are we meant to do?!
- We are still being charged full rent, I should clarify, despite the loss of the garage.

I would be enormously grateful if anyone could advise me as to what our rights are here. We are extremely concerned by the whole situation, and especially concerned that the landlord may attempt to claim on our damage deposit at the end of the tenancy based on observations made during inspections we were given no legal warning about or opportunity to prevent entry to the property during.

481
Guest Avatar
Gian 11th June, 2015 @ 02:24

Hello,
Please I rented a house from an Agency and was advised that the house is unfurnished,but when I moved in ,I realised that the Landlord have his stuffs in the garden storage and Loft IN THE House and locked up despite the Agency letting the House for me unfurnished and when i called him to tell him that i needed the storage space in the loft,he declined me access saying that the Loft is not part of the House Agreement,despite it not included in the tenancy agreement that the Landlord will be occupying any part of the storage,Please i need an advise , am I allowed to ask him to vacate the garage or start paying me rent for the storage in the Loft and Garden storage his occupying?

482
Guest Avatar
James 11th June, 2015 @ 09:15

Pete
Sorry to sound harsh but I really think you've allowed your landlord to walk all over you, you should have nipped this in the bud at an earlier stage - you have simply failed to exercise your rights as they are available to you. Clearly the landlord is gaining benefit from this work at the expense of your 'quiet enjoyment' of your home and in the process has failed to provide on a number of occasions the correct notice for gaining entry.

Now, since you've allowed this to proceed the following option is going to be more awkward for you to follow through on, but despite this it is no less legally sound. That is, you simply call a halt on the whole show unless your landlord is willing to financially compensate you for the loss of amenity and disturbance or agree to a reasonable set of entry rules for the workers. The way you do this is simply to deny them entry - it is your home, if they enter and you have told them that they may not then they are committing an offence (trespass). I suggest you read the many posts above which explain this in detail.

Gian
Your rights over a landlord's entry relate to your home. As far as I understand it, a garden area does not meet this criteria and as such a landlord does not need to provide notice to access the garden unless it requires entry through the property where you live. I strongly suspect that a loft area is also not considered part of your 'home' but unless the landlord has another means of accessing it then he would always need to serve notice to access this area.

A garage I am less clear about, certainly if it was not part of the house then his right of access may be the same as a garden. But in terms of usable space this is a different matter than right of entry. If you rented the house on the understanding that your would have a garage to use and then you found the landlord had a car parked in there then depending on your tenancy agreement and what it included and also how the rental was marketed you could you could bring a claim under breach of contract. If your landlord is frequently accessing/using these areas and it is affecting your quiet enjoyment of your home or he is not providing notice where he should then he may be guilty of harassment.

483
Guest Avatar
Lauren 13th June, 2015 @ 23:23

I am trying to get some advice for my mother in law. She is in a privately rented flat, which is in a far from adequate state and in need of several repairs. Her bedroom has become so damp that she has had to move her bed into the living room, the property has no form of heating, There is a leak in the roof and the windows are in a serious state of dis repair. The landlord is aware of all these issues and has been for well over a year. There has been promises to fix these faults but it has never happened. On numerous occasions the landlord has been rude and abusive towards my mother in law,her family members and her neighbors. He has also, on numerous occasions, ignored her calls when she has tried to find out if and when repairs are going to be carried out.
My mother in law is very wary of being on her own when the landlord comes to the property because of the fact he can be so intimidating and rude. She came home yesterday to a note scribbled on a scrap of paper stuck to her door stating that someone was coming to do a quote for replacing the windows at 10am this morning. He has done this before in the past and has still not carried out any work that has been quoted for. She tried to contact him to say this was not convenient, but had no luck so left a note on her door saying that she had to go out and would arrange another date. On returning home, it was apparent that the landlord had let himself into the property and had gone through at least one of her paperwork draws.
Was the landlord legally within his rights to let himself in?

484
Guest Avatar
James 15th June, 2015 @ 09:57

Lauren
The many posts above and the article itself should answer your question. For the avoidance of doubt 24 hours notice means 24 hours - not 12 or 18. If after receiving notice you tell the landlord he may not enter, he has no legal entitlement to enter (unless an emergency) if he does he would be trespassing.

Remember though, trespass is a civil offence and there is no immediate sanction. The same way as if I walk into someone's garden (or even unlocked house!) while they're not there. If you had changed the locks and the landlord broke down the door to enter however, that would be a criminal matter.

485
Guest Avatar
Diane 16th June, 2015 @ 19:37

Hi, a quick question, i rent a room from a live in landlord , i pay my rent regualrly, do my cleaning as required in shared areas, lock doors as i come & go, but most times when i go downstairs to cook she comes out to chat with me & to make sure i use the cooker correctly & switch things on & off properly , its become so bad i have stopped cooking when she is around as its becoming a nuisance & when i went on holiday last week she went into my room , i know this because there were childrens books left on my bed , is she allowed to be around me all of the time, i am becoming a recluse because of this.
also when i viewed the room she said no male visitors were allowed which was not a worry to me as i go to my boyfriends place anyway, but when i moved in on the saturday & i said i was gong to get one of my female friends round to help me put my bed together she said no men or women friends were allowed, that she wanted to get to know me first , i have been here 3 months now & still not allowed my friends around.
she didnt give me a tenanct agreement when i moved in & i dont get a reciept when i pay my rent & it has to be cash ( i asked to pay by bank transfer as i was robbed of £300 a few months ago ), so i am looking to move out , do i have to give a months notice ( pay rent ) she has a months rent as deposit or can i just say i am leaving in 4 weeks but i am not giving you amy more money, hope you can help, regards Diane

486
Guest Avatar
James 17th June, 2015 @ 10:34

Diane
It sounds like you are a lodger and therefore classified as an 'excluded occupier'. Your rights as a lodger are considerably less than as a tenant in an AST. If you look at the Shelter website your rights are fairly clearly explained there. To end the lodging agreement either you or the landlord should provide 'reasonable' notice. This would typically be at least one rental period or 28 days.

487
Guest Avatar
Amy 17th June, 2015 @ 15:48

Hello, While i was away my landlord emailed me asking for permission to go into my property to do some minor repairs to remove the water metre which wasnt anything serious.. due to being away and not having internet access I didnt receieved the email and when i got home to my shock I saw that they have been in without consent and also used my toilet which i felt uncomfortable about as the work was done in the hall way and you have to go upstairs into the actual fault to gain the access to the toilet. I have emailed the housing people who advised me they would look into it and somebody would look into it for me but still havent had any updates which I have emailed them today to see whats going on.. Has anyone got any advice for this situation? thanks

488
Guest Avatar
DAVID NUTTALL 22nd June, 2015 @ 08:43

I AM BEHIND WITH MY RENT. CAN MY LANDLORD ENTER MY FLAT WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE AND CAN HE CHANGE THE LOCKS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE?

I HAVE A FRIEND WHO IS A QUALIFIED LAWYER AND HE SAYS THAT THE ANSWER
IS NO TO BOTH QUESTIONS.

IS MY FRIEND CORRECT?

489
Guest Avatar
James 22nd June, 2015 @ 09:03

Your friend is correct - why would you not believe him?

Rent arrears don't give lanlords any additional right of entry.

490
Guest Avatar
Jamie 24th June, 2015 @ 21:12

We have moved out of the house we were renting, into a more suitable property. We gave correct notice to our landlord, paid the rent in full etc and gave the house a thorough clean. we offered the property back to our landlord at our expense, but the landlord refused to take house back on the grounds of being too busy to do so. We were told we must continue to care for it and cut grass etc until we hand it back, The hand back date is the end of this week. We were fine with this as only offered it back to landlord to make things easier for them. However today when we returned to the property to perform our check and cut the grass etc, we found that the house had been entered. Some rooms have been repainted and the furniture that we have to hand back as part of the lease has been removed. We also saw that the house is being advertised (fair enough) but agents have also been in and taken photos. Again we were not informed of this. We are now concerned regarding the hand back as we cannot return it as was because there have been so many changes in the last couple of days. We do have an inventory because we had to make our own when the landlord failed to do so. We provided landlord with a copy and we have photos to support the inventory. However, our question is can anyone advise on where we stand? We thought we were meant to be informed before anyone entered and certainly did not expect to see the furniture removed or decorating take place, particularly as our tenancy is still ongoing at the landlord's insistence. Thank you in advance for taking the time to read.

491
Guest Avatar
James 24th June, 2015 @ 22:41

Jamie
While you're correct in that the lanlord should have technically given notice, does it really matter in this case? Presumably all this work was done at the lanlord's request so why do you think this should cause a problem? If your lanlord failed to create an inventory then that is his problem. Without one and with the way he's entered and removed the furniture and redecorated without a final inspection then it'll be fairly tricky for him to reduce your deposit held with the DPS unless he's got compelling evidence in his favor.

492
Guest Avatar
Jamie 24th June, 2015 @ 22:54

Thank you for replying. The concern was/is simply in relation to our final inspection and regarding whether they can keep our deposit.Our photographs show that we kept the house in excellent condition but our contract states that on the date we hand back the property, all furnishings included in the lease must be in the house and in the rooms they were in at the start of tenancy. Also the walls/paintwork etc must be the same as at the start of tenancy. As the changes have been made in the last couple of days without our knowledge at the time and we are meant to hand the keys back on Friday plus demonstrate that we have cared for the house and furniture etc, we were just concerned because our landlord can say anything now concerning their condition etc since they have been removed. Our landlord never gave us notice throughout the tenancy as it was when wishing to enter the property. Whenever we complained we were simply informed that it was not our home and they could and would do what they liked. Thus, we have concerns. Thank you again for replying. We really appreciate you taking the time. Your reply has been helpful thank you

493
Guest Avatar
James 24th June, 2015 @ 23:17

Jamie
If you've read the article and posts above you will now realise your lanlord was wrong. When you rent a property it becomes your home not the lanlord's and the right of your lanlord to enter is defined by the law not by him! As for what is stated in your contract, the action taken by your lanlord has effectively invalidated most of that so I wouldn't be too worried on that count.

You should ensure that your lanlord has held your deposit with the Deposit Protection Service - it is now a legal requirement for almost all tenancies. Read here: https://www.gov.uk/tenancy-deposit-protection/overview

If your lanlord has not used the DPS then you can take the steps detailed in this article. If he's an amateur and tries to play smart and deducts from your deposit simply take him to court. Based on what you describe and certainly if he hasn't used the DPS you are almost certain to win and will also be able to recover any court/legal costs in the same action.

494
Guest Avatar
Jamie 25th June, 2015 @ 06:03

Thank you James. Our landlord did use the DPS. We managed to obtain a copy of the certificate directly from the DPS when our landlord refused to provide/show us a copy.

We have now managed to read all the above posts as well as the article, and are shocked (although also comforted) to know that there are so many who experience similar difficulties to ourselves regarding landlords. We have always chosen to rent but we had never experienced a difficult landlord prior to taking on this property. We realised there would be difficulties after we signed the lease. We arrived at the house at the time arranged by the landlord, signed the contracts, handed over an extremely large sum of money, took the meter readings together and were handed the keys. Our removal van was due to arrive two hours later but at this point, the landlord informed us they would not be letting us move in for another day. We explained that as everything had been arranged we had to move in and as a result we were refused entry until late evening. Then after we finally moved our furniture in, we were informed that although our furniture could be in the house, we were expected to spend the night elsewhere with our very young children. We refused. The landlords refused to remove their things from the garage that was included in the lease, thus we could not use it properly. They continued to store their things in our home and refused to remove them. They contacted us at midnight to inform us that builders were coming at 8 am. Builders would then not come. They insisted on house inspections at times that we deemed unreasonable (8 am or 8 pm), but then would not turn up or notify us of cancellation etc the list goes on. Naturally we have moved. We are so relieved to have a really wonderful landlord at our new home. They do exist. We thank you again for your valuable time. You have provided much reassurance at the end of a very stressful lease.

495
Guest Avatar
Jamie 30th June, 2015 @ 10:33

Just wanted to tell someone, our ex landlord has informed us they are keeping our entire deposit for damages (well over £1000). We did not cause any damage. We are even being accussed of bleaching a new carpet because some areas look darker. We didnt, it is carpet pooling and was like it when we moved in. There is nothing wrong with the carpets. They are also claiming for new oak worktops in the kitchen. Again we are accussed of bleaching them beyond repair? We didnt do this. The kitchen is extremely old and dated and was damaged badly when we moved in as our photographs show. Our suspicions regarding them have been confirmed. We know we must act now and compile our evidence. but where do we start? Without a proper inventory, no entry inspection and only our word against theirs what chance do we have?

496
Guest Avatar
Rach 2nd July, 2015 @ 18:12

Not landlords per se, but the bloody agents. We were aware it is stipulated in the tenancy agreement that there would be quarterly inspections. We had our first inspection a couple months ago and back then they sent a text notifying us of the time and date of the inspection and their inspector did arrive at said time.

However we were due an inspection round about now but since I have not received any notification of an impending inspection either by text phone or mail, I decided to call them 2 days ago to ask when it is. They told me it was 2nd July (today) but then could not give me a time. I told them we had something on this afternoon so can they please come in the morning. They said okay they've put that in their notes.

Well the morning came and went and nobody showed up. I called them at 2.30 pm roundabouts to ask what was going on. They said their staff member who was supposed to come inspect today took the morning off today and will be with us at about 6 pm. I said no because I had to take my daughter out as she is due to perform at orchestra at 4.30 pm. They then said well they would just come in as they have the key. I said I was not happy at that at all as I don't want some stranger snooping around my things when I'm not there. They said well the contract terms allow them to come and go for inspections any time they like as long as they gave 24hrs notice.

I said the contract only states they can come inspect on a quarterly basis but that doesn't give them an automatic right to come and go willy nilly whenever they like just because of inspections. I made it clear it was not the quarterly inspections I object to but the way they just want to come and go whenever time they like without my permission.

They said well it is impossible for them to give a time as they have to do several inspections on the same day and it was "impossible" for them to know in advance what time they will be able to make it here.

I said to them well that is ridiculous. They are getting paid for this and they can make sure they come on time. I mean don't they have Google maps, satnavs, etc. And plan in advance? I've had midwives come at set times (midwives often visit several different women a day) and none of that uncertainty (crap) as to when they can arrive!

They kept reiterating they have the right to enter my home at the time that suits them and say to me the only solution for me is to get a friend or a neighbour to sit at home and wait for them when I'm not around! How cheeky of them.

They also said they promise their inspector won't snoop around my stuff as she is very professional. I chuckled a bit and said "Well that's your word against mine."

Well I refused to back down and I said they must give me a mutually agreed time and date for inspections from now on or I will not accept theur inspections.

Then they said alright how about tomorrow in the morning from 9 to 1 pm? I said fine I'll be home then. It's still not ideal (what's with the 4 hr time gap when the agency is less than 10 mins away from us). But I rather have that than having to wait a whole day.

My question here is am I right in thinking there is no law surrounding the agents' rights (or lack of) to enter homes at whichever time they please, with regards to quarterly inspections? And so they don't have the right to insist I must let them in?

What can I do? I want to write a letter to them following this atrocious phonecall full of excuses and ridiculous terms. Who do they think they are, having the right to barge into my home with their set of keys whenever they like for quarterly inspections? I would not like to be coming out from a shower and seeing an agent inspecting my house after letting himself/herself in, for instance. Mighty pissed off about this.

497

Please leave a comment...

I'm a nobody

I'm a nobody

Landlord

Landlord

Tenant

Tenant

Letting / Estate Agent

Letting / Estate Agent

Legal

Legal

Buyer

Buyer

Developer

Developer

Enthusiast

Enthusiast


Leave a comment

Want FREE Landlord/Tenant advice from experienced Landlords?

Join our active Landlord community by registering to our Landlord Forum.
Learn, share and resolve your problems!