Tenant’s Right To Live In Quiet Enjoyment

A few days ago there was a little debate on Twitter about whether a landlord or letting agent had the right to enter a tenant’s property during the last month of the fixed term to take viewings, without giving notice to the tenant.

To me, that instantly seemed pretty ridiculous. I was pretty adamant that the Landlord and/or letting agent didn’t have the right to enter the property without giving at least 24 hours’ notice to the tenant, regardless of how long was left for the tenancy to end.

Unfortunately, the resistance continued to disagree, and I had a battle on my hands. They were still adamant that the landlord or agent had the right to enter the property to take viewings at their own will during the last month of the fixed term tenancy.

Meh, eventually I started to question myself after being explicitly told I was incorrect, and also because Landlord Law isn’t my strong point. Anyways, I started digging around on the Direct Gov website and eventually found what I was looking for.

What access rights does the landlord have?

The landlord or agent has the legal right to enter the property at reasonable times of day to carry out the repairs for which the landlord is responsible and to inspect the condition and state of the repair of the property. The Landlord must give 24 hours’ notice in writing of an inspection.

Quiet Enjoyment

The tenant has the legal right to live in the property as his or her home. The Landlord must ask the tenant’s permission before entering the premises.

Should these responsibilities and rights be included in the tenancy agreement?

Statutory responsibilities and rights will apply to you and the tenant even if they are not included in the tenancy agreement.

So from that, it’s clear that tenants are required to have 24 hours notice before the landlord, agent or anyone on behalf of the landlord can enter the premises. However, the tenant must grant permission. (Update: since this blog post was published, I’ve written a much more elaborate post on tenants rights on viewings/allowing access).

The tenant’s right to live in quiet enjoyment is a statutory right. Failing to give tenants that right could lead to landlord prosecution for harassment. Statutory rights cannot be revoked or overwritten. So for example, if your tenancy agreement states that the tenant MUST allow for viewings during the last month of the tenancy, it probably won’t make a single bit of difference- it cannot be legally enforced.

The Exception to the rule

There is an exception to the rule, as always. Only under a situation that can be deemed as an “emergency” may the Landlord enter without permission. This will include situations like a burst pipe or fire.

My tenant won’t allow me access

If you’re in the unfortunate possession of being refused access to your property, whether it be for a regular inspection or maintenance work, find out what options are available and what steps to take next over at the “My Tenant won’t let me into the property” blog post.

Legal advice

If you require legal advice on the matter, I highly recommend contacting your local Citizens Advice for free legal advice!

Like this post? Then maybe you should sign up to my FREE newsletter so you receive more like it!

74 Comments- Join The Conversation...

Showing 24 - 74 comments (out of 74)
Guest Avatar
Best Brian 25th August, 2010 @ 00:12

Jools I just stumbled on this site and I'm a land lord, and a quantity surveyor. I totally fail to understand why you are attacking this lady, she quite obviously is trying to do the right thing and I fail to see how your verbal attacks are helpful to anyone. You clearly did not read her question correctly and there's nothing unreasonable about it. As a land lord I would not cut down a tree my tenant clearly loved unless there was obvious danger to the property, only very large, old trees or close trees would be likely to cause such damage. I would be very careful before giving notice to cut a tree down that was not an obvious danger. Are you advocating all trees near properties need cutting down? Would you say the same about knocking down a wall of the house? I think your answer shows you are unpleasant and mentally unhinged. I wish I had a tenant who was so obviously dilligent and trying to get her facts straight as this lady, or indeed wants to care for and loves the garden so much.

24
Guest Avatar
Jools 25th August, 2010 @ 08:38

Here we go!

Brian - If YOU read my posts propertly you will see that I have stated more than once that it is distance from the property that is important as well as the type of tree.I do not advocate the indiscriminate cutting down of trees - but if they pose a threat to the property then they should go - especially if the trees have shallow root systems that can be affected in high winds by large sail area canopies. There is more danger of these falling and causing damage to roofs etc as opposed to deep root systems that cause damage to sub-structures.

If you want to see how damaging roots can be just look at how powerful Ivy is. Are you saying that just because IVY looks gorgeous it does not damage walls? What about the small christmas tree you plant next to your house that looks cute for a few years and then turns into a 25 foot + monster. Are you telling me that this will not cause damage?

Why would you be very careful before giving notice to cut down a tree that was not an obvious danger? You can't give a statement like that without giving the reason why!! Why would I want to knock a wall down if it was built properly? If it was close to my property and looked dangerous I would indeed take it down or re-build it. Last time I looked though stones/bricks did not have penetrating roots. Don't see your point there - sorry.

If you think those are verbal attacks then you really have not read my other posts have you?

I have been called many things by all sorts of people in the past but never "unpleasant and mentally unhinged" - by a Quantity Surveyor!! HA - you have made my year!

My philosophy is that if you cut down a tree you plant another somewhere else that is more appropriate. Trees are great, trees are beautiful. I enjoy hugging them and yes, talking to them BUT they have a place and trees do have a 'useful' life span depending on their species. Oaks et al - hundreds if not thousands of years in a woodland or forest. Firs - somewhere in the region of 25 years depending on location.

Jools
(very chuffty and off to tell my friends).

PS: As a surveyor I would expect you to know a little more about the subject but as a QS I suppose not. I am all for getting facts right - perhaps you should take a leaf out of your own book?

PPS: As a QS do you have x-ray vision?

25
Guest Avatar
Best brian 27th August, 2010 @ 02:02

Jools, what exactly are you chuffy about? The fact that you said "it's her tree, she can do what the F**K she wants with it" or "FFS some people", which is clearly an insult? No, I don't have x ray vision, it's true. I don't understand what reading your other posts has to do with whether or not you have made a verbal attack, it clearly was, and your other posts that I've seen are not like this. Your points about trees are correct, my point is that without knowing anything more about this tree, and the information in francina's post seems to indicate that it may be only for aesthetic reasons that the ll wants it removed, we cannot assume it's a danger to the property, and in this case I, as a land lord, would breach my tenants rights to enter their property for this purpose as the tree is part of the property they rented, in the same way as a wall is, and no I would not knock down a safe wall or a safe tree. If on the other hand the tree comes into the categories you describe, yes the roots are a potential problem. In this case I would still want to investigate how bad the problem is before proceeding.

26
Guest Avatar
Jools 27th August, 2010 @ 15:00

I am chufty about the fact that I have been called "unpleasant and mentally unhinged" by a QS but you will probably see that as a verbal attack so I am pretty much stuffed. Surveyors are not very high on my list of competent people given the fact that in my professional and personal life my last two attempts at dealing with surveyors have involved the resignation of the RICS surveyors because my construction company and structural engineers have provided evidence that the surveyors were inept. Yes I know there are good and bad surveyors as there are good and bad Landlords, estate agents, Tenants etc. Anyway.............

I do agree that my replied were based upon available data but therein lies the problem. Very often we only get one side of the story on here (usually biased towards the writer - be they tenant or Landlord) and that story is usually based on a subject that has an emotional context. My reply was based on the basic information given. OK - I did not read/misread the bit about the smoking clause in the original post - but I still stand by the fact that the information I have given is pertinent, factual and correct.

If the original poster had provided additional information like tree species, distances etc we both would be in a better position to provide accurate information but since she did'nt then we can't.
If you don't make assumptions then you can't begin to provide an answer. Surely you make assumptions every day in your job as a QS? You have to make assumptions regarding contract cost, estimates of quantity etc. It's only when you get the other side to provide hard facts that you are able to harden up the estimates into quotes.

I have to dissagree that you would breach your tenants rights in this case since as long as you gave requisite notice you would be allowed entry. They may object or say no at which point you politely ask them to sign a disclaimer stating that if they or any of their friends etc are injured by the trees they will not hold youu responsible and they in fact will make the necessary provision for providing liability insurance. Now then, since it is not possible to insure someone elses items it would be in their interest to allow you access to ascertain whether the tree is vunerable or not.

I still think that she was getting stroppy on her reply and I stand by my remarks. I will let other people make up their own mind about my mental stability not that I really give a monkeys about what you or others may think. If my posts encourage thinking or at least the need to peruse the subject further to gain a greater understanding of the matter then surely that is a good thing?

Jools

PS - hope everyone has a great weekend.

27
Guest Avatar
Best Brian 5th September, 2010 @ 01:16

Hi Jools. Thanks for your reply. I see where you're coming from. The only thing I would say is that access to ascertain the status of the tree is not the same thing as access to knock it down without knowing if it's vunerable. I think this is what the poster may have been concerned about, and that's what I as a landlord would not do. But as she has not posted again we're not sure. I apologise for calling you mentally unhinged, I did think your reaction to francina's post seemed a bit out of proportion but you're obviously rational most of the time and you make some very good points. Sorry to hear you've had bad experiences with surveyors. I guess you will add me to the list! Thanks anyway for answering my posts, all the best Brian

28
Guest Avatar
Jools 5th September, 2010 @ 15:58

Hey Brian,

The whole point of this site is to provoke discussion - it would be a boring world if we all agreed all the time!

No apology required! You are not on my list!! It's far too long at the moment!!

Cheers

Jools

29
Guest Avatar
Barry G 10th September, 2010 @ 14:15

Hello was hoping i could get some advice , I am currently renting out a property on an AST and have recently found out i should have got an EPC assesment done but did'nt. I now need to gain access to get one but tenant is refusing entry , where do i stand with this? what course of action can i take?

I have tried gaining access without permission from tenant but the door was bolted and was'nt answered. Am i liable for anything because of this?

thanks for any help

30
Guest Avatar
Jools 10th September, 2010 @ 15:43

Barry,

If one tenant is saying no then that is final - but you have to ask yourself WHY they are saying no. Is it a lone female who would prefer you to be accompanied by someone? Are they trying to hide something?

Anyway your attempt at gaining access without permission means you have broken the law and effectively attempted to trespass - however trespass is a very difficult area of law best left to those who are solicitors! If you are reported for illegal entry/trespass/harassment then you could find yourself up in front of the magistrate rather sharpish.

You have also broken the law by renting your property without an EPC and have left yourself open to be fined.

I would send the tenants a letter explaining that you need entry to fulfill your legal obligations as a landlord. Try to reason with them but if they say no - you are stuffed.

Jools

31
Guest Avatar
Barry G 11th September, 2010 @ 12:10

Thank you for your comments/advice , i realise now that i should have got an assessment done but i overlooked it as a requirement . I have spoken to a friend about this and he thinks that i can obtain an injunction at c.court to gain entry to get the assessment done what are your views on this ? The tenant is still not cooperating with my requests.

thanks again

32
Guest Avatar
Jools 12th September, 2010 @ 09:52

So Barry, you want to go into Court to obtain an injunction to enter your property where you are going to have to admit to the magistrate that you broke the law in initially renting the property and now you want to break your tenants rights to put right your mistake?

Good luck on that one pal!

Jools

33
Guest Avatar
Liam 12th September, 2010 @ 23:01

I'm with Jools on the tree thing! I have recently bought a property to rent out, though it is no palace... small terraced with a small back garden so I don't think I'll be having problems with trees (having said that, stupidity knows no bounds). Anyhow, good site/blog, some invaluble advice... Thanks!

34
Guest Avatar
Bev 26th September, 2010 @ 07:28

Hi
we have recently rented a house in the suburbs. after 3 months we have recieved a compaint in writing from the agent stating our neibour (semi detached house)had complained that she headr our tv at 6 am in our bedroom and us opening our wardrobes before departing for work. We leave at 7 20 and return at 18.20 M-F. My husband and I are the only occupants and we are proffesionals in our 50's.
We went round to see the neighbour and had a polite discussion. She is a retiree and she stated that she did not get up at 6 am and wanted to remain in bed until later for a "lie in".
She then asked us to not put our tv on unless it was between the hours of 9.00-23.00. She also asked if we would take our clothes out of the wardrobes the night before so she would not be disturbed.
We are miserable and feel at 55 we are back living with our parents!
We pay £1800 a month and want to know our rights on this? are we really not allowed to have the tv on to listen to the news and traffic reports at 6am or watch a movie in bed after 23.00 hours?
Should we move? Are we able to look to the neighbour for our moving costs?
PLEASE HELP!!!
Thanks
Beverly

35
Guest Avatar
Louise 15th January, 2011 @ 00:19

Just to advise concerning a previous question. Your Landlord may enter your property five times per calendar year, this being, once every three months and once for a yearly inspection. To enter the property they have to gain permission from the tenant for a day and time that is acceptable for the tenant. Although 24 hours is a reasonable request, the landlord must except that if this is not acceptable for the tenant, and that the tenant offers a reasonable alternative, then the landlord must accept these terms. A Landlord may only enter his or her property without your knowledge or indeed presence only if accompanied by emergency services. Some of you may find the following document helpful; The Office of Fair Trading Document OFT356 paragraph 3.32

I wish you luck as there are far too many people making money off the back of those less fortunate, and illegally at that. Whatever happened to MORALS?? And i'm only 38!!

36
Guest Avatar
matt 10th February, 2011 @ 15:32

Hi

The landlord's agents never arrange a specify date or time, they just say sometime between 10-4 on this week. They always email, and never confirm in writing.

This means no one can possibly be in when a representative of the agents visits.

Are we within our rights to ask for a specific date?

37
Guest Avatar
Tom 4th April, 2011 @ 20:07

The landlord to the block of flats next door to me is in the front and back gardens near the windows and in the stair well nearly every day - its a converted 4 storey Victorian terraced house. He gets on my nerves nosing round and commenting on my property, dog relatives and business in a very loud voice so God knows what it's like for his tenants. Maybe he thinks he will catch somebody in the nude or something, haha, he did used to be a Scout master until they stopped him.

38
Guest Avatar
Tom 4th April, 2011 @ 20:17

I'm not really related to dogs, just missed out a comma.

39
Guest Avatar
ron 31st January, 2012 @ 20:00

about two years ago some people move in the above flat the noise coming from upsairs flat is so bad that is making my life so bad that i dont want to go home after a hard days work.first was the loud music then a dog running around like crazy, the door always slamming kids running around all the time. now i even sleep in my van at night so i can some rest my landlord is not very helpful so what cani do?.

40
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 31st January, 2012 @ 21:33

Hello Ron,

It's not your landlord's job to solve your problem, it's your job. I see you have two options:
1 - Contact your local council to start their noise nuisance process;
2 - Make plans to move out. Maybe even tell your landlord why you're moving out, depending on how well you get on. It might prompt them do something about it.

Maybe even to 1 and 2 in unison and see which pays off first.

41
Guest Avatar
missdee 11th April, 2012 @ 10:24

We have tenants who have been very troublesome and therefore we gave them the two months notice as set out in the AST. The AST gives us the right to show the property to prospective tenants within the last two months as long as 24hours notice is given. I have provided more than 24hrs notice and the problematic tenant is saying that I am infringing on his quiet enjoyment because I sent them an email letting them know that I had scheduled a viewing in two days rather than asking his epxress permission in a very nice way(his exact words). He is refusing access to the flat until we ask in the way he prefers. What do you suggest?

42
Guest Avatar
Matt 11th April, 2012 @ 10:32

A company in South London, called Jacksons, just write to you and say "Sometime within the next month we will come and inspect the property" - which is a cheeky way to circumvent this protection. I used to refuse, and push back politely and ask for an appointment, which after about 2 weeks, they eventually worked out, but their excuse was that they used contractors and didn't have access to their diaries.

Comments?

43
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 17th April, 2012 @ 00:58

Hello Matt,

Yes, that is cheeky and bone idle cost utting at your inconvenience.

If that kind of thing matters to you then I think you've acted completely reasonably. If they had been reluctant to offer you an appointment then I'd point out I may reserve the right to change the loack at the landlord's expense, to prvent his agents entering teh property in an unathorised manner.

44
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 17th April, 2012 @ 01:05

Hello missdee

I suggest you ask in the way he prefers, if that's what it takes to get your prospective next renters through the door.

The way you write, you give me the impression you're informing rather than asking. If someone brought a string of people into my home at short notice I'd be hacked off if I was only informed and not asked. I could have dinner parties planned, friends round, family stoaying over etc.

45
Guest Avatar
Caroline 10th August, 2012 @ 01:50

I have been living in our house now for 9 months, and we have had 2 inspections done, the first time I received a letter from the agent with a date, but they will not specify a time, the second time my partner received an e mail from the agent, but he works away and i did not receive the email, since then I suspect the agents of carrying out an inspection without giving any notice at all, as when i returned home one day the front door wasn't locked, and i have a very nervous cat, who has since been so nervous,hes had cystitis constantly since this day and has so far cost me close to £1,500 at the vets. I told the agents that I would always like to be present during an inspection as my cat is very nervous, but they refuse to ever give a specific time, and if I would need to change the date I have to pay a £25 fee, could someone tell me where I stand please, I am a very good tenant, and have always had excellent references from previous properties I have lived in, so there is no need for agents to feel they should pay a surprise visit!!

46
Guest Avatar
Becs 13th August, 2012 @ 16:52

I've just found this forum after an incident. We got home from holiday late last night with young child in arms to find the front door unlocked and that someone had been in our home. On later checking our landline messages, it seems that the estate agent had arranged a boiler inspection. They left a message and sent a letter but obviously as we were on holiday, we didn't get that notice, and they went ahead without our permission. They have been told before that they must use my mobile and/or email to contact us, which they didn't. Also that we want to be present during any inspections etc. We are also good tenants and have created no problems and would have arranged access immediately on our return. We're extremely distressed that some stranger has been in our home, and they are extremely lucky that despite the door being unlocked for 4 days (!!!) nothing has been stolen. This is not quiet enjoyment of our home. I've rented out my house (in a different city) for a long time and would never do this to my tenants. This is not an emergency and could have waited a further two weeks. I'd like to know where we go from here. We like the house and the neighbours and the owner seems OK, but obviously object to the way the agents have acted.

47
Guest Avatar
Kat 13th September, 2012 @ 11:25

My partner and I have recently moved into a rented property just over 4 weeks ago. We weren't informed verbally that the property was for sale until after we had signed the contracts. I need to read through the contract thoroughly to see if it is written in there but there is no For Sale sign on the property and we feel the letting agent that we dealt with purposely kept this information from us. We signed a 6 month lease starting on 6th August and were contacted on Sat 8th Sept to be told that someone was interested in buying. They are aware they can not move in until our lease runs out. They then rang me at work on Tuesday and left multiple voice messages trying to arrange a viewing. I am not comfortable allowing them to gain access when we are not present as all our possessions are obviously in there and i am pretty sure this will render our contents insurance invalid.
Basically I feel hassled and inconvenienced and have only lived in the property 4 weeks. We are having a couple round to view this Saturday at 10am, which again makes me feel inconvenienced. My main worry is that they are going to hassle us and phone us and leave messages for the next 5 months and that we will have veiwings every weekend. We are paying a lot of money to live there and have not yet settled in. Do we have any rights?

48
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 13th September, 2012 @ 12:05

Hello Kat,

I think you've got a case here. Have a look at your AST agreement, the part which talks about rights of viewing in your last (usually) one month of tenancy. It talks about allowing reasonable access during the last month to allow re-renting to the next tenants.

So assuming your tenancy agreement has this clause here's my take on your legal rights...

1. The presence of the clause implicitly admits the extra inconvenience you suffer from viewings. Any contracts you into to allowing this inconcenience in your last month.

2. The action of the landlord in marketing for sale the property whilst also marketing it for rent means they expect you to suffer this inconvenience from the outset of your contract and for a period possibly much longer than one month.

3. They expect you to suffer an inconvenience which is normally not tolerated, so much so that it has to be specifically brought into the contract to be allowed (point 1)

4. But they remained silent on this issue during negotiations to rent. They have forced you into a "fait a complit" situation through the legal tort of Misrepresentation.

5. Had you known, you would have either rented somewhere else, or asked for a rent reduction to compensate.

6. The remedy for most Misrepresentation is either Damages or Restitution. So you have a choice:

+ Ask for the rent to be reduced
or
+ Explain you want your Quiet Enjoyment for the first five months of your AST. As per the Implied Term created by their marketing actions. This means no viewings, etc until February. And if you feel anything has happened behind your back, you'll immediately change the locks and deduct the cost from the rent due.

From this strong barganing position you can then negotiate to a place you feel works for you.

I hope this helps. Please let us know how you get on.

49
Guest Avatar
Ami 12th October, 2012 @ 11:38

I was wondering if someone could help me.
Basically we started renting a house in July and I have received a letter today saying out letting agents (which have been nothing but a pain!) want to inspect the property, we have nothing to hide but they want to do it in 2 days time.
I have read over the contract and nothing in there to say they can do this whenever they wish. My concern about it is that neither myself or my house mate will be in and in the letter is says we don't need to be (so they will let themselves in) I sent an email saying we would prefer to re-schedule a time when we are both in or we will take photos and send them to them today, is this a reasonable request? I dont understand why they think its okay to let themselves in without us there. The letter wasn't a request it was TELLING us that it was going to happen. We have paid our rent fine and I dont see any reason why this is happening...also this weekend is going to now be spent cleaning the house from top to bottom because I know how annoyingly picky they are.

50
Guest Avatar
Cardifflandlord 14th October, 2012 @ 10:59

Ami,

If you say no then they cannot come in irrespective of their 48 hr notice. If they consequently do so then they have committed trespass and would be in a whole world of hurt. The only time they can gain entry without your permission is in an emergency.

They cannot tell you how to live either. OK - you need to keep the place clean and vermin free but again, it is your home and they have no juristiction in telling you what to do. If they try to, they are putting themselves in threat of legal action by you for breach of quiet enjoyment of the property.

Explain to them in the strongest possible terms that you know your rights regarding entry in relation to the housing act and that whilst you are happy to agree to a mutually agreeable time for an inspection when you are there, you will not tolerate excessive inspections of the property, nor will you tolerate interference in your normal lives. Explain to them that if they do enter your property when you have said no, they will be committing an offence and you will have no hesitation in contacting the authorities and taking legal action against them. Tell them you expect them to obey their obligations relating to the housing act in relation to entry.

Let us know how you get on.

51
Guest Avatar
Sue 10th November, 2012 @ 13:26

I have a question about quiet enjoyment - the agents I rent from do interim inspections roughly every 3 months. During the last inspection they took photos of the inside of the property without my consent - apparently to highlight some defects ie a crack on the wall in the bedroom - but rather than just take a close photo of the crack they took a photo of the entire bedroom including photos I have on the wall - can they do this without letting me know. The first I knew of it was when they landed on my doormat by post this morning.

52
Guest Avatar
Cardifflandlord 11th November, 2012 @ 09:14

Hey Sue,

I have absolutely no idea however I reckon there is at least a partial issue here to do with your privacy or at least the privacy of the persons in the photos. Since the agents have reproduced the images in the pictures without permission they are in fact in breach of copyright which in itself is a serious offence. They do not have the necessary permissions to photograph or include the photograph/s in the first place nor do they have the necessary permissions to reproduce the image.

I agree that they should not have photographed the entire room unless it was to highlight the position of the crack or to show scale or the size unless they had your permission and you had the opportunity to protect the identity of those in the pictures. To take a picture of a room in itself should not be an issue as it's location should not be apparent.

I would go back to the agent and insist that they hand over the images to you or the copyright holder and insist they delete any further images from their camera/card/computer. I actually think that quarterly inspections are on the verge of harassment and remember irrespective of what they say, if you say no to an inspection they cannot enter the property without being at serious risk of trespass/BOQE/harrasment.

53
Guest Avatar
Sue 11th November, 2012 @ 18:15

Thank you cardifflandlord for your helpful response - the agents could have easily shown the scale and size of the crack by using a ruler - folder or even their own hand - plus just a short description of which wall it was on plus a photo of just that wall would have done the job - particularly as that wall has no photos or pictures on it. Unfortunately as well as taking photos of the room they also photographed the outside of the property pretty much making it easy to identify. Interesting that I can say not to an inspection - I have always thought as long as they gave me 24hrs notice in writing I have not choice - I too have felt that quarterly inspections feels like harrassment - especially as I have now lived here for nearly five year - I would have thought 6 monthly would have been adequate. Given too that I always report any problems with the property promptly and give them no hassle over access. Even though one of their contractors has on more than one occasion pitched up without any notice whatsoever - and indeed one day I heard a noise outside my front door and found him trying to open the back gate to gain access to the garden without any notice at all to me.

54
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 15th November, 2012 @ 22:52

Hello Sue,

How's about this for a slightly differnt slant to the advice offered by Cardiff?

I would suggest you mention in writing to the agent, ahead of the next inspection, that you are particular about your privacy. You don't have a problem with photos that are anonymous. You do mind having your pictures / posessions in any pictures whihc are necessary.

To secure your full co-operation with the inspection, you will want to review all photos taken by the agent on the camera. You'll delete any you don't like.

Also, you can say no to an individual request. It must be for a good reason, like it's inconvenient. But you need to offer a reasonable, alternative date. You can't refuse point blank to allow an inspection to happen sooner or later.

55
Guest Avatar
Ronnie 23rd March, 2013 @ 04:58

I have found your blog extremely interesting and maybe someone can give me advice.I rent the downstairs maisonette and the upstairs is rented out by a different landlord than mine.Over the years he has removed carpet and underlay from every room and replaced it with the cheapest carpet and no underlay.The floor is hardboard and not sound proofed properly in the first place now its hell.I can here them talking,the bedroom is the worse I wont go into detail,and of course they can hear me even putting a glass of water down.They dont like it but of course they have the advantage of being able to stomp on my floor.I have spoken to landlord and environmental health to no avail.My friends live around here and being ill I do need there support so I dont really want to move.Any ideas please

56
Guest Avatar
Jeremy 31st March, 2013 @ 11:31

Hi Ronnie,

Have you contacted Buidings Regs dept. I know it's also the Council, but their depts. do seem to work in splendid isolation to each other.

Buildings regs (for quite a while) have stipulated good soundproofing must be installed when houses are converted into flats. The sound proofing will be required in between the floor and ceiling, so the floor covering should be irrelevant to sound proofing.

If the required sound proofing is not in place, Buildings regs can order it to be properly fitted, even if this means pulling up the floor and inconvenience to the upstairs tenants.

Hope this helps.

57
Guest Avatar
becks 23rd April, 2013 @ 21:11

oh, jools.. you really shouldn't give out advice on subjects (trees and subsidence)that you dont know anything about

58
Guest Avatar
renter 24th September, 2013 @ 21:26

Hi, I wonder if I can get some advice! We are bout to rent a large detached family home but the landlord has put a clause in the agreement that we are not to put up a washing line (garden is ample!!) And no smoking in the property or premesis! As a family not being able to dry clothes in the garden is a major problem, and although we do not smoke and never allow guests to smoke in side, I feel it is unreasonable to ask my guests/family to remove themselves from the garden!! Am I being unreasonable? Thank you.

59
Guest Avatar
william 15th February, 2014 @ 14:00

I have drug dealers for neigbours and they have been making my life and my neighbours lifes hell for 6 years now with there anti social behaviour Barking dogs there kids driving scramblers up and down the avenue at all hours there kids playing football in the street hitting cars and knocking over pot plants running through and destroying my flower beds throwing Rubbish into the street and the dogs barking at all hours when any car comes into the street. The police say don't confront these people as they are dangerous. The police have raided there house on several occasions. The landlord says as long as he is getting his money he does not give a dam.I am at my witts end people say if I go to the council and report them that there friends will put my windows in. I have spoke to them about the noise and they promise that they will get it sorted but never do.
I am ready for the funny farm.......I go to the council on Monday morning my wife will go and stay with friends.
Doesn't seen right when I work all hours and pay a huge mortgage They get there mortgage payed by central government I have lost faith with the system all I want is to live my life in piece and quite.......Is that to much to ask for I annoy no one my wife is semi disabled
And her mother has passed away two weeks ago.....We are both at breaking point.....But hay who cares???????

60
Guest Avatar
lisa 21st February, 2014 @ 22:14

can i refuse to let the agents in to do a inspection....i have month left on my tenancy as the house has been sold,ive let in people to view and the surveyor of the buyer,but dont want them in to take there pics etc in this last month,i have rooms stacked with boxes for moving,furniture all over the place downstairs,upstairs is mainly just beds..i have a 8 month pregnant daughter living with me .im trying to sort council accomadation so at appointments,and scans and appointments for my daughter as she is expecting twins one of which is dead,i cant see there point in walking round a alleyway of boxes when they have the house bk in 4 weeks anyway.x

61
Guest Avatar
paula 14th April, 2014 @ 13:41

Hello everyone!!
I'm currently living a very stressful situation in my house and I would really appreciate it if you could help me with some information.

I'm renting a house with my partner under an "Excluded Tenancy Agreement" but my Landlady lives downstairs, which allow her to really control everything we do.
The hole situation is very long to describe, so I would like to make you some specific questions so I might understand this right "Live in quiet enjoyment"a little bit better, as I found it a very open concept, where anybody could include or exclude anything.

If in the tenancy agreement there is no clause that states or regulates anything about having guests overnight, or visits in our home.
Has the Landlady the right to restrict this?

Have we got as tenants the right to invite over anybody we want (if this person respect the rules, nor breaking or damaging not making noise...) for the time that we would like?
Obviously I'm not talking about sub renting the house, I'm talking about having my parents and my sister coming for a week or so to visit me. Or inviting a couple of friends to have dinner with us and allowing them to pass the night with us if it's very late to take the tube to go home.

Is there any law in relation to the license of a house that could state that in a house just 3 people can sleep inside, and even for a night, nobody else could sleep in?

I'm asking this because my Landlady is telling me that I broke the law when one of my friends stayed one night here because she missed the last tube to go home and she doesn't allow us anymore to have our family for 4 or 5 days visiting us, when we have one bedroom and one huge living room with 2 sofa beds.. so there is no problem of space in the house.

Would you consider this a breaching of the "quiet enjoyment right" that we have as tenants?

I would really really appreciate if you could give me some light about this, as she's threatening us with written letters and I really want to do things well and I would love to know which are my rights as well as my obligations as tenants.

PS. If you'd need more information please ask I would be very please to explain you more.

THANK YOU SO MUCH for your time,
Can't wait to see your answers!!
Paula.

62
Guest Avatar
lisa 24th July, 2014 @ 10:04

hi there, not sure if anyone can help me but my landlady put her property up for sale a month into my contract, the potential buyers she had lined up came round last week and have since pulled out over an issue with a leaking bath which has been on going for the last few months,I have stated that I want to be present for all viewings but she is coming back saying I am making access difficult etc just wanted to know if I am within my rights to be there when the estate agent shows people round or if she can legally give them permission to enter?
thanks

63
Guest Avatar
Nick 18th August, 2014 @ 22:17

"The tenant must grant permission"?

The tenant cannot withhold permission?

64
Guest Avatar
Colin 29th August, 2014 @ 17:36

Hi all, I've read plenty of posts in pursuit of a solution to my issue I have at the moment. In short, landlord is selling the house I'm renting. He has been absolutely crap in regards to repairs, although I don't think much of the agents either. Front door doesn't close properly presenting a security risk to me and my partner, and our young Daughter. Sockets in the kitchen spark and don't always turn the appliances on, which is dangerous, we've mentioned these problems several times over years now (still not done) and have had a person representing the agency see it in person. Anyway, now he's selling we're expected to allow viewings, and have done. However, I'm fed up with them and find them very intrusive, disturbing us and it's mainly disrupting for our little one seeing strangers before her wind down time before bed. I also work long hours and don't want people snooping round my house when I'm shattered and just want to watch tv, have dinner and spend what little time I do have with my family. Can I stop them coming in? It's not fair and I'm pissed off with it. They've also been opening cupboard doors and storage cupboards which have my personal belonging in, which I'm also not please about. Some advice would be great, thanks.

65
Guest Avatar
Thomas 4th September, 2014 @ 09:33

I have a slight issue, I'm a licensee that lives at the same place I work, on Tuesday my manager came round to do her weekly room inspection and decided to take photos of rooms she felt were unacceptable, on wednesday in our morning staff meeting she displayed photos of these rooms for the whole staff team to see, is this a gross violation of my privacy or is she with her rights to do this?

66
Guest Avatar
Imad 5th September, 2014 @ 11:16

Hi. I rented an apartment ten years ago. The owner of the apartment wanted to get me out of them. I want you to know that after Thanksgiving What are my rights and whether he can get me out of the den, including compensation

67
Guest Avatar
Hannah 4th February, 2015 @ 11:26

Interesting reading. Our tenancy (London) ends in about 3 weeks, and for the past 3 weeks we have been letting in one or more people per day for viewings. I know this is in the contract, but feel that multiple people per day (they all come in separately, with about 3 agents showing the place) for weeks is absolutely not permitting us quiet enjoyment. Am I being reasonable or does the viewings clause cancel out the quiet enjoyment right? I have just let the agents know we can't have multiple people very day for weeks more, and suggested a couple of days a week viewing free. We have till now been quite reasonable and permitted inspections at a couple of hours notice regularly.

For backstory we know it is taking a while to let because the landlord wants too much for it, he has generally been terrible and i feel we are being inconvenienced more than we need because of his unreasonable expectations - he has had offers and refused them. I do know this doesn't affect our rights or his but it does motivate me to ensure I am defending our rights, given he has ignored ours in the past!

68
Guest Avatar
andkat 19th October, 2015 @ 20:43

Hi
I currently let my house and I rent another one where I work 200 miles away so I get this from both sides of the argument.
What I would like to know is, I requested my agent, who looks after my property, to take photographs throughout my property so I can see for myself the condition. They have thrown this back at me with the quiet enjoyment reasoning.
I understand this and my tenants have been in the property for two years, is this genuine that they cant take photos or I will be done for harassment? or is it just a ploy so they don't have to do it?

I look forward to any responses

69
Guest Avatar
jack 26th May, 2016 @ 11:34

hello everyone, can somebody tell me, than within 24 h notice ofcourse how many viewings can i have expect a day, is any limit on it , have 7 so far booked , from 9.00, to 13.00 over the saturday

70
Guest Avatar
Anne 21st September, 2016 @ 17:39

I am in the process of trying to get a Cat B HMO licence for a property, let to young professionals. The Local Auth Housing officer seems to be particularly difficult. He inspected the property and said that as the tenants all have TVs in their rooms, and there was evidence of tenants EATING in their rooms, it can't be Cat B as they "clearly don't live as a family unit". I pointed out the normal behaviour of teenagers was precisely that - to no avail. He says if he grants Cat B they can't eat in their rooms!!! I was wondering whether the right to quiet enjoyment of the property was relevant in this case - I do not want (nor should I) dictate how my tenants live their lives (within reason)! Any suggestions how I deal with this despot? He is threatening to prosecute (even though we only have 3 tenants currently) and when we say we want to appeal, he just laughs and says that as he hasn't given his formal decision, we can't!! Am in a cleft stick!

71
Guest Avatar
Namratha 19th October, 2016 @ 13:50

I would be leaving mid tenancy and I was tasked with finding a replacement. I got to know through the person I'd reached out to that my landlady and he are meeting today at the property but neither of them notified me explicitly. Am I not entitled to get 24 hour's notice if someone wants to see my room and I'm not around? I don't like the idea of people in the room when I'm not there so am I within my right to inform my landlady that in future to please check with me before letting people in?

72
Guest Avatar
Joanne 23rd October, 2016 @ 16:58

Hi, I am after some advice, I have moved into a property with a private landlord 8 months ago, since I have been here she has turned up to take some of her belongings from the property cellar (twice), which I was ok with, she then called to say she was struggling and needed to store a boiler and solar panels in the cellar to which I showed I was not pleased and skirted around the subject saying they wouldn't fit, the next thing she told me she was taking over the shed in the garden to use for storage and put a padlock on the door, then I came home from work to a load of wood with nails in dumped in the garden which I was less than pleased with as I have a dog (which the landlord knows about) that could hurt herself, now she is constantly texting me to make arrangements for her to plug a drill in my house to put shelves up in the shed and quite demanding on the time as she is going on holiday, she has also said she is going to put a bigger shed up in the garden next to the existing one so she has more storage!!!!

Im really starting to get fed up with it, is this classed as harassment or breach of quiet enjoyment? I don't want to start throwing out laws and tenants rights at her as she may ask me to move out, also it says in my agreement no pets but she agreed to let my dog stay before I signed it......any ideas how I should approach this?

Many thanks

73
Guest Avatar
Rose 16th January, 2017 @ 16:57

Can a landlord walk around the property for no reason whenever he feels like.
Also, he has a shed up against the rental with gas cans, paint and other flameable items. In November is caught fire and he is accusing me of setting the fire.

74

Please leave a comment...

Nobody

Nobody

Landlord

Landlord

Tenant

Tenant

Agent

Agent

Legal

Legal

Buyer

Buyer

Developer

Developer

Enthusiast

Enthusiast